Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Increasing value and reducing waste in stroke research.

Eivind Berge1, Rustam Al-Shahi Salman2, H Bart van der Worp3

  • 1Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

The Lancet. Neurology
|April 18, 2017
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

FAST BEE (Keeping FAST First): A Public Stroke Education Design to Drive EMS Activation.

CNS neuroscience & therapeutics·2026
Same author

Artificial intelligence assisted detection of large vessel occlusion on CT angiography in acute stroke patients: a multi-reader multi-case study.

BJR artificial intelligence·2026
Same author

Endovascular Acute Stroke Intervention-Tandem Occlusion (EASI-TOC) study: protocol and rationale.

European stroke journal·2026
Same author

Impact of structured medication reviews on prescribing in English primary care: a retrospective observational cohort study.

The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners·2026
Same author

ESTREL-Fatigue-association of levodopa with post-stroke fatigue.

European stroke journal·2026
Same author

Exploring the implementation and integration of structured medication reviews in primary care: A qualitative evaluation using normalization process theory.

The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners·2026
Same journal

Resolution of expression of concern-Serotonergic pathology and disease burden in the premotor and motor phase of A53T α-synuclein parkinsonism: a cross-sectional study.

The Lancet. Neurology·2026
Same journal

UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology: 75 years of innovation.

The Lancet. Neurology·2026
Same journal

Correction to Lancet Neurol 2026; 25: 631.

The Lancet. Neurology·2026
Same journal

Epstein-Barr virus and multiple sclerosis: from associations to mechanisms to potential therapies.

The Lancet. Neurology·2026
Same journal

Correction to Lancet Neurol 2025; 24: 740-52.

The Lancet. Neurology·2026
Same journal

Correction to Lancet Neurol 2026; 25: 357-67.

The Lancet. Neurology·2026
See all related articles
This summary is machine-generated.

Improving stroke research efficiency is crucial for better patient outcomes and societal impact. This study identifies waste sources and recommends best practices for stroke research funding and design.

Area of Science:

  • Neurology
  • Public Health
  • Health Services Research

Background:

  • Stroke represents a significant global health burden, necessitating efficient research funding.
  • Past stroke research has faced challenges in value generation due to issues in topic selection, study design, and execution.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify inefficiencies and waste in stroke research.
  • To recommend strategies for enhancing the value and impact of stroke research funding.
  • To showcase best practices in conducting and disseminating stroke research.

Main Methods:

  • A collaborative initiative involving European stroke researchers.
  • Analysis of common pitfalls in stroke research across various stages (planning, execution, reporting).
  • Development of recommendations based on identified issues and best practices.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Evidence indicates progress in improving research efficiency, but substantial room for enhancement remains.
  • Specific areas for improvement include research topic selection, study design, data analysis, and reporting standards.
  • The study highlights the need for a concerted effort from researchers, funders, and regulators.

Conclusions:

  • Addressing inefficiencies in stroke research is vital for maximizing return on investment and improving human health.
  • Stakeholders should consider the study's recommendations to optimize future stroke research endeavors.
  • Continued focus on best practices can lead to more valuable and impactful advancements in stroke care and prevention.