Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[The MSR-UCL cochlear implant: new adaptations].

M Gersdorff1, R Sneppe, S Wittemans

  • 1Clinique Universitaire ORL Saint-Luc, Bruxelles, Belgique.

Annales D'Oto-Laryngologie Et De Chirurgie Cervico Faciale : Bulletin De La Societe D'Oto-Laryngologie Des Hopitaux De Paris
|January 1, 1988
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

"Tumulus" stabilization of a total ossicular replacement prosthesis.

European annals of otorhinolaryngology, head and neck diseases·2018
Same author

[Myringoplasties for anterior tympanic perforations: Our surgical technique].

Revue de laryngologie - otologie - rhinologie·2015
Same author

[Reconstruction of bone defects in the earcanal with hydroxyapatite].

Revue de laryngologie - otologie - rhinologie·2015
Same author

[Ossiculoplasty with hydroxyapatite bone cement].

Revue de laryngologie - otologie - rhinologie·2013
Same author

Esteem 2 middle ear implant: our experience.

Audiology & neuro-otology·2012
Same author

Tinnitus and otosclerosis.

B-ENT·2010

The MSR-UCL cochlear implant was modified from a monocanal to a bicanal device, isolating the pick-up from the amplifier. These changes offer significant technical and audiophonological benefits for cochlear implant users.

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Otolaryngology
  • Audiology

Context:

  • The MSR-UCL cochlear implant, initially developed in September 1985, has undergone further technological advancements.
  • Previous iterations utilized a monocanal design.

Purpose:

  • To detail the modifications implemented on the MSR-UCL cochlear implant.
  • To describe the transition from a monocanal to a bicanal apparatus.
  • To explain the isolation of the pick-up from the amplifier.

Summary:

  • The MSR-UCL cochlear implant was transformed from a monocanal to a bicanal device.
  • A key modification involved isolating the pick-up component from the main amplifier unit.
  • These adjustments aim to enhance device performance.

Related Experiment Videos

Impact:

  • The modifications provide demonstrable technical advantages for the cochlear implant.
  • Audiophonological benefits resulting from these adjustments are highlighted.
  • This advancement contributes to improved outcomes for individuals with hearing loss.