Related Experiment Videos
Future Generations and the Justifiability of Germline Engineering
1Central European University, Budapest, Hungary.
The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy
|April 19, 2017
Summary
Germline gene editing in living individuals risks human gene pool diversity, potentially harming future generations. Ethical interventions require reversibility and control to mitigate health risks associated with reduced genetic variation.
Area of Science:
- Human genetics
- Bioethics
- Reproductive medicine
Background:
- Germline modifications in living individuals raise concerns about long-term impacts on human gene pool diversity.
- Potential negative repercussions include reduced heterozygosity and uniformization of genes involved in reproductive recombination.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the ethical justification of germline interventions targeting future generations.
- To argue that such interventions are ethically unjustifiable without mechanisms for control or reversal.
Main Methods:
- Ethical argumentation and philosophical analysis.
- Examination of potential negative consequences of reduced genetic diversity.
- Consideration of counterarguments related to safety, population focus, and harm reduction.
Main Results:
- Germline modifications can reduce heterozygosity and alter reproductive recombination, potentially leading to health risks.
- The lack of control or reversibility in germline interventions poses significant ethical challenges.
Conclusions:
- Germline interventions on living individuals are ethically problematic due to irreversible impacts on future generations' genetic diversity.
- Ethical permissibility hinges on the possibility of controlling or reversing interventions when necessary.