Assessment of anthropometric indicators in children with cerebral palsy according to the type of motor dysfunction

Jorge Abraham García Iñiguez1, Edgar Manuel Vásquez-Garibay, Andrea García Contreras

  • 1Universidad de Guadalajara. abrahamon_2@hotmail.com.

Nutricion Hospitalaria
|April 20, 2017
PubMed

Insights

Anthropometric measurements in children with cerebral palsy (CP) differ based on motor dysfunction type. The spastic CP group showed higher measurements, and specific growth charts are more suitable than WHO standards for this population.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatrics
  • Clinical Nutrition
  • Rehabilitation Medicine

Background:

  • Children with cerebral palsy (CP) often exhibit altered growth patterns.
  • Accurate anthropometric assessment is crucial for monitoring nutritional status and health outcomes in children with CP.
  • Existing growth references may not be universally applicable to this diverse population.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate variations in anthropometric measurements among children with CP based on motor dysfunction type.
  • To evaluate the suitability of different reference standards for assessing anthropometry in children with CP.
  • To identify the most appropriate methods for height measurement in this population.

Main Methods:

  • A cross-sectional study involving 108 children (2-16 years) with CP, classified by motor dysfunction type, gender, and age.
  • Measurements included weight, mid-upper-arm-circumference (MUAC), and alternative height measures.
  • Anthropometric indices (height/age, weight/age, BMI) were assessed using percentiles and Z-scores against various growth references, including WHO standards.

Main Results:

  • The spastic CP group (73.1%) showed significantly higher weight, height, and MUAC compared to other motor dysfunction types (p < 0.05).
  • Children were predominantly classified at Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) levels IV (14.6%) and V (73.1%).
  • Upper-arm length (UAL) was found to be less suitable for height estimation than knee height (KH) and lower-leg length (LLL).

Conclusions:

  • Anthropometric indicators are significantly higher in children with spastic CP compared to other types.
  • Knee height (KH) and lower-leg length (LLL) are more appropriate for estimating height than upper-arm length (UAL) in children with CP.
  • World Health Organization (WHO) growth charts are not ideal for assessing most anthropometric indices in children with CP; alternative references like Day and Brooks charts are more suitable.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos