Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Nurses need support, too.

Rachel Webb

    Nursing Standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987)
    |April 20, 2017
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    The High Court ruled that Charlie Gard, a baby, should be allowed to die. This decision impacts end-of-life care discussions for critically ill infants.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Acute Rheumatic Fever Diagnostic Network (ARC Network) clinical recruitment protocol.

    BMJ open·2026
    Same author

    Māori and Pacific People's perspectives on Group A Streptococcus vaccine development and delivery in Aotearoa, New Zealand.

    PLOS global public health·2026
    Same author

    Evaluation, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Sydenham Chorea: Consensus Guidelines.

    Pediatrics·2025
    Same author

    Preliminary Cardiac Experience With Hydroxychloroquine in New Zealand Children With Acute Rheumatic Fever.

    Journal of the American Heart Association·2025
    Same author

    Pandemic mitigations reveal an association between superficial group A streptococcal infections and acute rheumatic fever incidence in Auckland New Zealand.

    Emerging microbes & infections·2025
    Same author

    Diverse diagnostic and management approaches for acute rheumatic fever in Australia and New Zealand: findings of a prospective clinical study.

    BMJ open·2025
    Same journal

    Effect of artificial intelligence on nursing documentation and patient safety.

    Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987)·2026
    Same journal

    Strategies for responding to anger from patients, relatives and carers.

    Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987)·2026
    Same journal

    Nurses' role in detecting early and subtle signs of patient deterioration in acute hospitals.

    Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987)·2026
    Same journal

    Pulse oximetry: exploring its role, limitations and challenges in clinical practice.

    Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987)·2026
    Same journal

    Anorexia nervosa: identification and management by non-specialist nurses.

    Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987)·2026
    Same journal

    Skin and soft tissue abscesses: assessment and management.

    Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987)·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Ethics
    • Pediatric Law

    Background:

    • The case of Charlie Gard involved complex ethical and legal considerations regarding the medical treatment of an infant.
    • Discussions centered on the best interests of the child versus parental rights in end-of-life decisions.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To analyze the High Court's ruling in the Charlie Gard case.
    • To examine the legal and ethical frameworks governing pediatric end-of-life care.

    Main Methods:

    • Legal analysis of the High Court's judgment.
    • Review of ethical guidelines pertaining to pediatric critical care.

    Main Results:

    • The High Court ruled that life support for Charlie Gard should be withdrawn.
    • The decision highlighted the legal authority of the court in cases of medical disagreement.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Conclusions:

    • The ruling underscores the challenges in balancing medical expertise, parental wishes, and legal mandates in pediatric end-of-life scenarios.
    • This case has significant implications for future medical decision-making for critically ill children.