Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

642
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
642
Drug Concentration Versus Time Correlation01:15

Drug Concentration Versus Time Correlation

2.5K
The plasma drug concentration-time curve is a crucial tool in pharmacokinetics, representing the drug's concentration in plasma at different time intervals post-administration. This curve illustrates the drug's journey from absorption into the systemic circulation, distribution to body tissues, and eventual elimination through excretion or biotransformation.
Two pivotal parameters are the minimum effective concentration (MEC) and the minimum toxic concentration (MTC). The MEC is the...
2.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Molecularly defined subpopulations of leptin receptor neurons dissociate the control of food intake from blood pressure.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Taste Plasticity in Nutrition and Health: A Scoping Review.

Nutrients·2025
Same author

Adversity and error-monitoring: Effects of emotional context.

Psychophysiology·2024
Same author

Pathways to opioid use and implications for prevention: voices of young adults in recovery.

Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy·2024
Same author

Community engagement and financial arrangements: Navigating institutional change.

Journal of clinical and translational science·2024
Same author

Effects of task context on EEG correlates of mind-wandering.

Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 4, 2026

The Power of Interstimulus Interval for the Assessment of Temporal Processing in Rodents
10:27

The Power of Interstimulus Interval for the Assessment of Temporal Processing in Rodents

Published on: April 19, 2019

7.4K

Intertrial interval duration affects error monitoring.

Rebecca J Compton1, Elizabeth Heaton1, Emily Ozer1

  • 1Department of Psychology, Haverford College, Haverford, Pennsylvania.

Psychophysiology
|April 20, 2017
PubMed
Summary

Short intertrial intervals (ITIs) impair cognitive control and self-monitoring. Faster trial timing in tasks like the Stroop test can disrupt error detection and processing, impacting performance accuracy.

Keywords:
EEGERPsalpha rhythmattentioncognitive controlerror processing

More Related Videos

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking
05:58

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

9.4K
The 5-Choice Serial Reaction Time Task: A Task of Attention and Impulse Control for Rodents
09:43

The 5-Choice Serial Reaction Time Task: A Task of Attention and Impulse Control for Rodents

Published on: August 10, 2014

47.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 4, 2026

The Power of Interstimulus Interval for the Assessment of Temporal Processing in Rodents
10:27

The Power of Interstimulus Interval for the Assessment of Temporal Processing in Rodents

Published on: April 19, 2019

7.4K
Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking
05:58

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

9.4K
The 5-Choice Serial Reaction Time Task: A Task of Attention and Impulse Control for Rodents
09:43

The 5-Choice Serial Reaction Time Task: A Task of Attention and Impulse Control for Rodents

Published on: August 10, 2014

47.1K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Psychophysiology

Background:

  • The intertrial interval (ITI) is crucial for cognitive control and self-evaluation.
  • Understanding ITI effects on neural error monitoring is vital for optimizing task design.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how different intertrial interval (ITI) durations affect neural signals of error monitoring.
  • To determine the impact of ITI timing on cognitive control mechanisms.

Main Methods:

  • A between-subjects design with 35 participants was employed.
  • Participants completed a Stroop task with short (768 ms), medium (1280 ms), or long (1792 ms) ITI durations.
  • Electroencephalography (EEG) was used to record neural signals.

Main Results:

  • The short-ITI group showed lower accuracy and reduced error-related negativity.
  • Error-related alpha suppression during the ITI was lower in the short-ITI group.
  • Increased post-error slowing was observed with shorter ITIs.

Conclusions:

  • Rapid trial pacing, indicated by short ITIs, can disrupt self-monitoring processes.
  • Potential capacity limitations or processing bottlenecks may explain the disruptive effects of short ITIs.
  • Optimizing ITI duration is important for effective cognitive control and error monitoring.