Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Less effective selection leads to larger genomes.

Tristan Lefébure1, Claire Morvan1, Florian Malard1

  • 1Université de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS UMR 5023, ENTPE, Laboratoire d'Ecologie des Hydrosystèmes Naturels et Anthropisés, F-69622 Villeurbanne, France.

Genome Research
|April 21, 2017
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Microplastic retention within infiltration basins used for managed aquifer recharge: Effectiveness and key controlling factors.

Environmental pollution (Barking, Essex : 1987)·2026
Same author

Why recombination hotspots?

PLoS genetics·2026
Same author

Environmental factors affecting streambed microplastics in a non-perennial river catchment.

Environmental research·2026
Same author

Systematic mapping of O-GlcNAc transferase and O-GlcNAcase defines disease-associated variants.

The Journal of biological chemistry·2026
Same author

Working with C. difficile in a Hypoxic Chamber.

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)·2026
Same author

The tiny germline chromosomes of Paramecium aurelia have an exceptionally high recombination rate and are capped by a new class of Helitrons.

BMC biology·2026
This summary is machine-generated.

Smaller effective population sizes in subterranean species reduce selection efficacy, leading to increased genome size due to less efficient purging of repetitive elements. This explains genome size variation in groundwater-dwelling isopods.

Area of Science:

  • Evolutionary Biology
  • Genomics
  • Population Genetics

Background:

  • Genome size variation in eukaryotes is poorly understood.
  • Effective population size influences selection efficacy and is hypothesized to drive genome size evolution.
  • Empirical investigation of this hypothesis has been challenging.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To test the hypothesis that effective population size influences genome size evolution.
  • To investigate the mechanisms driving genome size increase in subterranean species.
  • To explore the relationship between selection efficacy, genome size, and repetitive element dynamics.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of 22 de novo transcriptomes and low-coverage genomes from asellid isopods.
  • Comparison of surface-dwelling and subterranean species with independent habitat shifts.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Assessment of transcriptome-wide divergence (d N /d S) and repeat element invasion rates.
  • Evaluation of correlations between genome size, body size, growth rate, and polymorphism.
  • Main Results:

    • Subterranean asellid isopods exhibit higher transcriptome-wide d N /d S ratios, indicating reduced selection efficacy.
    • Genome size significantly increases (25% on average) in subterranean isopods, correlated with reduced selection efficacy.
    • Increased genome size in subterranean species is driven by higher invasion rates of repeat elements, less efficiently purged by purifying selection.
    • No correlation was found between genome size and body size or growth rate.

    Conclusions:

    • Reduced effective population size in subterranean environments lowers selection efficacy, facilitating genome size increase.
    • Genome size expansion in groundwater-dwelling isopods is primarily driven by the accumulation of repeat elements due to inefficient purifying selection.
    • Polymorphism data alone may obscure the relationship between effective population size and genome size due to demographic factors.