Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Whole Body Motor Adaptation in Goldfish Using Fish Operated Vehicle.

The European journal of neuroscience·2025
Same author

Cognitive and motor disturbances in depression: insights from comprehensive behavioral assessments.

Frontiers in psychiatry·2025
Same author

Gestalt, Navon and Kanizsa illusion processing in CVI, ADHD, and dyslexia Children with Normal verbal IQ.

Frontiers in human neuroscience·2025
Same author

Selective processing of clinical information related to correct and incorrect diagnoses: An eye-tracking experiment.

Medical education·2024
Same author

Eyes on CVI: Eye movements unveil distinct visual search patterns in Cerebral Visual Impairment compared to ADHD, dyslexia, and neurotypical children.

Research in developmental disabilities·2024
Same author

The archerfish uses motor adaptation in shooting to correct for changing physical conditions.

eLife·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 4, 2026

Modulating Cognition Using Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Cerebellum
11:47

Modulating Cognition Using Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Cerebellum

Published on: February 15, 2015

30.3K

Cerebellar tDCS Does Not Enhance Performance in an Implicit Categorization Learning Task.

Marie C Verhage1,2, Eric O Avila1, Maarten A Frens1,2

  • 1Department of Neuroscience, Erasmus MCRotterdam, Netherlands.

Frontiers in Psychology
|April 21, 2017
PubMed
Summary

Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) did not improve implicit categorization learning. This study found no significant difference in performance or learning speed between participants receiving real or sham cerebellar tDCS.

Keywords:
brain stimulationcerebellumcognitionhumansinformation integration

More Related Videos

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation tDCS of Wernicke's and Broca's Areas in Studies of Language Learning and Word Acquisition
12:49

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation tDCS of Wernicke's and Broca's Areas in Studies of Language Learning and Word Acquisition

Published on: July 13, 2019

18.1K
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation tDCS for Memory Enhancement
10:37

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation tDCS for Memory Enhancement

Published on: September 18, 2021

16.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 4, 2026

Modulating Cognition Using Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Cerebellum
11:47

Modulating Cognition Using Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Cerebellum

Published on: February 15, 2015

30.3K
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation tDCS of Wernicke's and Broca's Areas in Studies of Language Learning and Word Acquisition
12:49

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation tDCS of Wernicke's and Broca's Areas in Studies of Language Learning and Word Acquisition

Published on: July 13, 2019

18.1K
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation tDCS for Memory Enhancement
10:37

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation tDCS for Memory Enhancement

Published on: September 18, 2021

16.0K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Science

Background:

  • Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) modulates neuronal excitability.
  • Evidence for tDCS effects on cerebellar learning is inconsistent.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of cerebellar tDCS on implicit categorization learning.
  • To determine if anodal cerebellar tDCS enhances performance in a learning task.

Main Methods:

  • Forty participants completed an implicit categorization task involving visual stimuli.
  • Anodal tDCS or sham stimulation was applied over the right cerebellum during the task.
  • Performance was assessed by accuracy and reaction time across learning trials.

Main Results:

  • Participants improved performance and learning over trials in both groups.
  • No significant differences in accuracy or reaction time were found between anodal tDCS and sham groups.
  • Cerebellar tDCS did not affect overall performance or the learning rate.

Conclusions:

  • Anodal cerebellar tDCS does not appear to modulate performance or learning in implicit categorization tasks.
  • Further research may be needed to explore other parameters or tasks for cerebellar stimulation.
  • The findings contribute to understanding the role of the cerebellum in learning and the efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation.