Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

8.7K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
8.7K
Chemical Shift: Internal References and Solvent Effects01:17

Chemical Shift: Internal References and Solvent Effects

1.5K
In an NMR sample, precise measurement of the absolute absorption frequencies of nuclei is difficult. A standard internal reference compound is added, and the frequency difference between the reference signal and sample signals is measured.
The internal reference compound generally used in NMR spectroscopy is tetramethylsilane (TMS). TMS is preferred because it is chemically inert, soluble in NMR solvents, and easily removable. Also, the highly shielded methyl protons in TMS yield an intense...
1.5K
Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy: Interference01:25

Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy: Interference

2.2K
Interference leads to systematic error in atomic absorption (AA) measurements by enhancing or diminishing the analytical signal or the background. These interferences can be grouped into three main categories: spectral interference, chemical interference, and physical interference.
Spectral interference occurs when signals from other elements or molecules overlap with the analyte signal, falsely elevating or masking the analyte's absorbance. This interference can be corrected using Zeeman,...
2.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Segmentation-guided photon pooling enables robust single-cell analysis and fast fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy.

Journal of biomedical optics·2026
Same author

Lagrangian deformation tracking for strain imaging.

Progress in biomedical engineering (Bristol, England)·2026
Same author

FLIM Playground: An interactive, end-to-end graphical user interface for analyzing single cells with fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy.

Cell reports methods·2026
Same author

Geometry aware neural radiance fields for freehand ultrasound reconstruction.

Biomedical physics & engineering express·2026
Same author

3D Freehand Ultrasound Reconstruction of the Carotid Artery.

Ultrasound in medicine & biology·2026
Same author

Introducing ARONG, A 3D Reconstruction Method for Highly Deformed Histology.

Journal of imaging informatics in medicine·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 3, 2026

Author Spotlight: A Stable Phantom Material for Optical and Acoustic Imaging
04:54

Author Spotlight: A Stable Phantom Material for Optical and Acoustic Imaging

Published on: June 16, 2023

3.9K

Lower Bound on Estimation Variance of the Ultrasonic Attenuation Coefficient Using the Spectral-Difference

Kayvan Samimi1, Tomy Varghese1,2

  • 11 Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.

Ultrasonic Imaging
|April 21, 2017
PubMed
Summary

This study establishes a theoretical lower bound for estimating ultrasonic attenuation using the Spectral-Difference Reference Phantom Method (RPM). Experimental results validate these bounds, improving precision in tissue characterization.

Keywords:
local estimationreference phantom methodspectral differencespectral fitstandard deviationultrasonic attenuation coefficient

More Related Videos

Cortical Bone Assessment Using Ultrasonic Guided Waves: A Reproducibility Study in a Healthy Population
09:02

Cortical Bone Assessment Using Ultrasonic Guided Waves: A Reproducibility Study in a Healthy Population

Published on: January 31, 2025

1.7K
Construction of a Preclinical Multimodality Phantom Using Tissue-mimicking Materials for Quality Assurance in Tumor Size Measurement
06:33

Construction of a Preclinical Multimodality Phantom Using Tissue-mimicking Materials for Quality Assurance in Tumor Size Measurement

Published on: July 29, 2013

11.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 3, 2026

Author Spotlight: A Stable Phantom Material for Optical and Acoustic Imaging
04:54

Author Spotlight: A Stable Phantom Material for Optical and Acoustic Imaging

Published on: June 16, 2023

3.9K
Cortical Bone Assessment Using Ultrasonic Guided Waves: A Reproducibility Study in a Healthy Population
09:02

Cortical Bone Assessment Using Ultrasonic Guided Waves: A Reproducibility Study in a Healthy Population

Published on: January 31, 2025

1.7K
Construction of a Preclinical Multimodality Phantom Using Tissue-mimicking Materials for Quality Assurance in Tumor Size Measurement
06:33

Construction of a Preclinical Multimodality Phantom Using Tissue-mimicking Materials for Quality Assurance in Tumor Size Measurement

Published on: July 29, 2013

11.7K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Biophysics
  • Acoustics

Background:

  • Quantitative Ultrasound (QUS) relies on tissue attenuation for diagnosis.
  • The Reference Phantom Method (RPM) corrects system biases in QUS.
  • Accurate attenuation estimation is crucial for non-invasive tissue monitoring.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Derive a theoretical lower bound for attenuation coefficient estimation variance using Spectral-Difference RPM.
  • Compare theoretical bounds with simulated and experimental data.
  • Validate the derived bounds and identify optimal processing parameters for QUS.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a probabilistic model of backscattered signal spectrum under diffuse scattering assumption.
  • Compared Spectral-Difference RPM with a modified Spectral Fit Method (SFM).
  • Evaluated estimation standard deviation (STD) across various Radio-Frequency (RF) data processing parameters in tissue-mimicking phantoms.

Main Results:

  • Measured STD curves consistently exceeded the derived theoretical lower bound.
  • Experimental validation confirmed the theoretical framework's accuracy.
  • Identified processing parameter ranges for precise ultrasonic attenuation coefficient estimation.

Conclusions:

  • The derived theoretical lower bound is experimentally verified.
  • This framework enhances tissue characterization by guiding the selection of optimal QUS processing parameters.
  • Provides a basis for improving the precision of attenuation coefficient estimation in clinical QUS applications.