Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 3, 2026

13:08
Measurement of Fronto-limbic Activity Using an Emotional Oddball Task in Children with Familial High Risk for Schizophrenia
Published on: December 2, 2015
9.5K
Comparisons between the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-Adolescent-Restructured Form (MMPI-A RF) and
John M Stokes1, David L Pogge2, Robert P Archer3
1Department of Psychology, Pace University.
Psychological Assessment
|April 21, 2017
Summary
The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-Adolescent-Restructured Form (MMPI-A-RF) shows good agreement with the MMPI-Adolescent (MMPI-A) for validity and scale independence. This study supports potential adjustments to MMPI-A-RF interpretive cutoffs for adolescent psychiatric assessments.
Area of Science:
- Psychological assessment
- Adolescent psychiatry
- Psychometrics
Background:
- The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-Adolescent-Restructured Form (MMPI-A-RF) is a revised version of the MMPI-Adolescent (MMPI-A).
- Understanding the psychometric properties and associations between these forms is crucial for accurate adolescent psychological evaluations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore the association between the MMPI-A-RF and the MMPI-A in a large sample of adolescents undergoing inpatient psychiatric treatment.
- To evaluate the validity scale agreement and explore potential adjustments to interpretive cutoffs for the MMPI-A-RF.
Main Methods:
- A sample of 3,516 adolescents in inpatient psychiatric treatment was analyzed.
- Validity inclusion cutoffs were applied to 2,798 adolescents for both MMPI-A-RF and MMPI-A measures.
- Statistical analyses included agreement rates, correlational analyses, classification agreement, and stepwise linear regression.
Main Results:
- A high agreement rate (92.5%) was found for global case validity identification.
- MMPI-A-RF Restructured Clinical (RC) scales showed greater independence and lower interscale correlations compared to MMPI-A clinical scales.
- Moderate associations were observed between comparable RC and MMPI-A clinical scales, with stronger agreement for PSY-5 scales.
Conclusions:
- The MMPI-A-RF demonstrates strong validity agreement with the MMPI-A and offers improved scale independence.
- Empirical support exists for adjusting interpretive cutoffs for MMPI-A-RF validity scales.
- The findings support the MMPI-A-RF's utility in adolescent psychiatric assessment, with potential implications for interpretive procedures.

