Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 3, 2026

06:56
Author Spotlight: Advancing Cardiac Procedure Testing Prior to Embarking on Large Animal Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
1.7K
Clinical Trial Principles and Endpoint Definitions for Paravalvular Leaks in Surgical Prosthesis: An Expert Statement
Carlos E Ruiz1, Rebecca T Hahn2, Alain Berrebi3
1Hackensack University Medical Center, Structural and Congenital Heart Center, Hackensack, New Jersey.
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
|April 22, 2017
Summary
The PVL Academic Research Consortium established standards for paravalvular leak (PVL) closure device trials, defining core principles and clinical endpoints. This aims to standardize PVL closure assessments, similar to transcatheter aortic valve replacement trials.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Medical Device Research
Background:
- The Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC) standardized endpoints for transcatheter aortic valve replacement trials.
- No established standardization exists for clinical endpoints in trials of circumferentially sutured surgical valve paravalvular leak (PVL) closure devices.
- This lack of standardization hinders consistent evaluation of PVL closure device safety and effectiveness.
Purpose of the Study:
- To establish core principles, clinical endpoints, and endpoint definitions for clinical trials focused on PVL closure devices.
- To provide a framework for assessing disease severity and collecting data in PVL closure studies.
- To create a standardized approach for evaluating the efficacy and safety of PVL closure interventions.
Main Methods:
- Convening the PVL Academic Research Consortium to review existing evidence.
- Developing recommendations for the assessment of PVL disease severity.
- Establishing updated endpoint definitions and a 5-class grading scheme for PVL evaluation, aligned with VARC principles.
Main Results:
- A comprehensive set of core principles and recommendations for PVL closure trials has been developed.
- A 5-class grading scheme for PVL assessment was created, harmonizing with VARC standards.
- Key areas requiring further research and unresolved issues in PVL closure were identified.
Conclusions:
- The PVL Academic Research Consortium provides crucial recommendations for standardizing PVL closure device trials.
- Standardized endpoints and assessment methods are essential for reliable evaluation of PVL closure technologies.
- Further research is necessary to address remaining challenges and advance the field of PVL closure.

