Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Whole-genome sequencing reveals high-risk ESBL and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales on maternity ward surfaces in Cameroon.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Exploring the resilience of playa lake ecosystems to climate change: A microbial perspective.

Journal of environmental management·2026
Same author

Removal of antimicrobial resistance determinants from wastewater: Role of capacity overloading and treatment technology in wastewater treatment plants.

Journal of environmental management·2025
Same author

Dissecting the physics of bacterial biofilms with agent-based simulations.

Current opinion in solid state & materials science·2025
Same author

A multi-endpoint approach to ecotoxicological assessment of wastewater polluted rivers using zebrafish.

Environmental research·2025
Same author

Mapping the scarcity of data on antibiotics in natural and engineered water environments across India.

Frontiers in antibiotics·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 3, 2026

Ordering Single Cells and Single Embryos in 3D Confinement: A New Device for High Content Screening
14:22

Ordering Single Cells and Single Embryos in 3D Confinement: A New Device for High Content Screening

Published on: September 18, 2016

9.0K

Reducing discrepancies between 3D and 2D simulations due to cell packing density.

Robert J Clegg1, Jan-Ulrich Kreft1

  • 1Centre for Computational Biology, Institute of Microbiology and Infection, School of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B12 5TT, United Kingdom.

Journal of Theoretical Biology
|April 22, 2017
PubMed
Summary

Simulations of microbial biofilms show that 2D models can accurately represent 3D systems by adjusting for space packing density differences. This improves computational efficiency in biofilm modeling.

Keywords:
Agent-based modelBiofilmHeuristicsIndividual-based modelSpatial structure

More Related Videos

An Efficient and Flexible Cell Aggregation Method for 3D Spheroid Production
07:46

An Efficient and Flexible Cell Aggregation Method for 3D Spheroid Production

Published on: March 27, 2017

25.7K
Non-Destructive Evaluation of Regional Cell Density Within Tumor Aggregates Following Drug Treatment
10:13

Non-Destructive Evaluation of Regional Cell Density Within Tumor Aggregates Following Drug Treatment

Published on: June 21, 2022

2.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 3, 2026

Ordering Single Cells and Single Embryos in 3D Confinement: A New Device for High Content Screening
14:22

Ordering Single Cells and Single Embryos in 3D Confinement: A New Device for High Content Screening

Published on: September 18, 2016

9.0K
An Efficient and Flexible Cell Aggregation Method for 3D Spheroid Production
07:46

An Efficient and Flexible Cell Aggregation Method for 3D Spheroid Production

Published on: March 27, 2017

25.7K
Non-Destructive Evaluation of Regional Cell Density Within Tumor Aggregates Following Drug Treatment
10:13

Non-Destructive Evaluation of Regional Cell Density Within Tumor Aggregates Following Drug Treatment

Published on: June 21, 2022

2.7K

Area of Science:

  • Computational biology
  • Biophysics
  • Mathematical modeling

Background:

  • Three-dimensional (3D) spatial modeling is computationally intensive compared to 2D simplifications.
  • Previous studies on individual-based models (IBMs) of microbial biofilms reported quantitative, but not qualitative, discrepancies between 2D and 3D simulations.

Discussion:

  • The discrepancy between 2D and 3D biofilm simulations arises from differing space packing densities (circles vs. spheres).
  • Methods to compensate for packing density differences include scaling internal individual density or inter-individual distances.
  • These adjustments allow 2D models to better approximate 3D system behavior.

Key Insights:

  • Packing density is a critical factor causing simulation discrepancies between 2D and 3D models.
  • Scaling parameters can reconcile quantitative differences, making 2D models more reliable.
  • This finding is crucial for optimizing computational resource allocation in complex biological simulations.

Outlook:

  • Further validation of these scaling methods in diverse IBMs is warranted.
  • The principles discussed may extend to other simulation techniques like smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH).
  • This research facilitates more efficient and accurate computational modeling in microbiology and related fields.