Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 3, 2026

A Modified Technique for Arteriovenous Fistula Construction in Rabbits
Published on: February 10, 2023
Arteriovenous access banding revisited
Gabriela Teixeira1,2, Paulo Almeida1,2, Clemente N Sousa1,3
1Vascular Access Center (Grupo Estudos Vasculares - GEV), Porto - Portugal.
Insights
Arteriovenous access banding is effective for high flow access and haemodialysis access-induced distal ischaemia. Ultrasound guidance is key to preventing complications and ensuring success in vascular access procedures.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Nephrology
- Interventional Radiology
Background:
- High flow access (HFA) and haemodialysis access-induced distal ischaemia (HAIDI) are common complications of arteriovenous (AV) access.
- AV access banding is a potential treatment option for these conditions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To validate the effectiveness and safety of AV access banding for HFA and HAIDI.
- To assess the incidence of complications, particularly thrombosis, associated with the procedure.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective study of 119 patients undergoing AV access banding for HFA or HAIDI.
- Analysis of patient demographics, comorbidities, symptoms, and intraoperative ultrasound findings.
- Definition and tracking of technical failure and complications like thrombosis, rupture, and aneurysm.
Main Results:
- Primary clinical success was achieved in 71.4% of patients, with a secondary success rate of 84.9%.
- The HAIDI group was older and had a higher prevalence of diabetes.
- Older age and intraoperative ultrasound control were significantly associated with primary success.
Conclusions:
- AV access banding is an effective procedure for both HFA and HAIDI.
- The study did not find a high incidence of thrombosis, contrary to previous reports.
- Intraoperative ultrasound control is crucial for preventing technical failure and improving outcomes.
Purpose:
The aim of this study is to validate the current applicability of arteriovenous access banding in high flow access (HFA) and/or haemodialysis access-induced distal ischaemia (HAIDI).
Methods:
This retrospective study was conducted at the GEV (Grupo de Estudos Vasculares) vascular access centre. The clinical records of consecutive patients undergoing banding for HAIDI and HFA symptoms, between June 2011 and January 2015, were reviewed until April 2015. All vascular access patients' consultation records and surgical notes were reviewed. We analysed and compared patients' age, gender, comorbidities, symptoms and intraoperative ultrasound control. We defined technical failure as recurrence of symptoms, requiring new banding. Excessive banding, access thrombosis, rupture and false aneurysm development were registered as complications. Primary clinical success was defined as improvement of symptoms or effective flow reduction after banding, with no need for reintervention. If one reintervention was necessary, we have defined it as secondary clinical success.
Results:
Overall, 119 patients underwent banding: 64 (54%) with HAIDI and 55 (46%) with HFA. The HAIDI group was significantly older (65 ± 13 years compared with 56 ± 22 years, p = 0.001) and had significantly greater number of patients with diabetes (56% vs 24%, p = 0.004). Primary success was achieved in 85 patients (71.4%) and the secondary success rate was 84.9%. Older age (p = 0.016) and intraoperative ultrasound control (p = 0.012) were significantly associated with primary success.
Conclusions:
Our results do not corroborate the high incidence of thrombosis previously reported as associated with AV access banding and suggest that ultrasound control is crucial for preventing technical failure. The procedure was effective on both compared groups.
Related Concept Videos
Hemodialysis I: Introduction
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Intravenous Regional Anesthesia
One of the advantages of...
Hemodialysis II: Procedure and Complications
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management

