Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 3, 2026

Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning
Published on: November 2, 2012
The probability of object-scene co-occurrence influences object identification processes.
Geneviève Sauvé1,2, Mariane Harmand3, Léa Vanni3
1Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, 1033 Pine Avenue West, Montreal, H3A 1A1, Canada.
The brain uses context to predict objects, with irregularities slowing perception. This study found distinct brain activity patterns for probable, improbable, and impossible object-scene pairings, revealing how context influences object identification.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Perception and Object Recognition
- Computational Neuroscience
Background:
- The human brain leverages contextual information for predictive processing of visual stimuli.
- Statistical regularities between objects and their scenes influence perception and identification efficiency.
- Previous models propose a continuum of object-scene co-occurrence probabilities affecting cognitive processing.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the electrophysiological correlates of context effects in object perception.
- To differentiate brain activity associated with varying probabilities of object-scene co-occurrence.
- To explore how the brain utilizes top-down and bottom-up influences based on contextual predictability.
Main Methods:
- Recorded event-related potentials (ERPs) from 30 healthy participants (18-34 years old).
- Compared brain activity for object-scene pairs across probable, improbable, and impossible conditions.
- Analyzed neural responses within specific time windows linked to context effects.
Main Results:
- Observed anterior negativities between 250-500 ms for improbable and impossible conditions compared to probable.
- Found differences in anterior negativity, with improbable being more negative than impossible.
- Detected a parieto-occipital positivity, with improbable conditions showing greater positivity than impossible conditions.
Conclusions:
- Contextual probability influences object identification via distinct neural processing pathways.
- Moderate probability (improbable) may rely more on top-down processing, while null probability (impossible) engages more bottom-up influences.
- A posterior positivity may reflect error monitoring to prevent integration of incorrect visual information.
Related Concept Videos
Methods of Classification and Identification
Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect
Probability in Statistics
An example of a simple event is a coin toss. The result of a coin toss is either a head or a tail. Here, head and tail are two simple events. These two simple events make up the sample space. Further, the probability of an event occurring falls within the range of 0 to 1. The probability of an...
Structural Classification of Joints
A fibrous joint is where the adjacent bones are united by fibrous connective...
Probability Histograms
Actor-Observer Effect

