Electrical superior vena cava isolation using a novel pace-and-ablate technique under diaphragmatic electromyography
Shinsuke Miyazaki1, Shigeki Kusa1, Hitoshi Hachiya1
1Cardiovascular Center, Tsuchiura Kyodo Hospital, Tsuchiura, Ibaraki, Japan.
Background:
Diaphragmatic compound motor action potential (CMAP) amplitude monitoring is a standard technique to anticipate phrenic nerve injury during cryoballoon ablation.
Objective:
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of a novel superior vena cava isolation (SVCI) technique using simultaneous pacing and ablation through the tip of a single mapping/ablation catheter.
Methods:
Fifty-four patients with atrial fibrillation were included. Radiofrequency energy was delivered point by point uniformly for 20 seconds with a power of 20 W until achieving SVCI. Diaphragmatic CMAPs were obtained from modified surface electrodes by high-output pacing from the mapping/ablation catheter throughout the procedure (pace-and-ablate group). Applications were interrupted if CMAP amplitudes significantly decreased without fluoroscopy. The data were compared with those of the 54 patients undergoing conventional SVCI (conventional group).
Results:
Successful SVCI procedures were achieved in all with a mean of 10.3 ± 2.9 applications. In total, among 559 ablation sites, CMAPs were recorded at 95 (17.0%) with baseline amplitudes of 0.45 ± 0.23 mV. In 10 patients (18.5%), isolation was achieved without any radiofrequency deliveries at CMAP-recorded sites. Among the 95 applications, 6 (6.3%) were interrupted because of CMAP amplitude reductions. At the remaining 88 sites, 20-second radiofrequency applications were delivered without any amplitude decrease (from 0.45 ± 0.21 to 0.46 ± 0.23 mV; P = .885). Phrenic nerve injury occurred in 1 patient in the pace-and-ablate group, which recovered 3 months later, and in 3 conventional group patients, of whom 1 recovered 1 month later (P = .308). The total procedure time tended to be shorter (14.5 ± 6.3 minutes vs 16.7 ± 9.2 minutes; P = .153) and fluoroscopy time significantly shorter (3.9 ± 3.0 minutes vs 6.7 ± 5.7 minutes, P = .002) in the pace-and-ablate group than in the conventional group.
Conclusion:
A novel and simple pace-and-ablate technique under diaphragmatic electromyography monitoring might be feasible for an electrical SVCI.
