Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Psychosurgery

Psychosurgery

Psychosurgery, the surgical alteration or permanent removal of brain tissue to alleviate severe psychological conditions, stands as one of the most radical and controversial treatments in the history of mental health care. Its development and application have evolved significantly, marked by dramatic shifts in scientific understanding and ethical perspectives.
Historical Development of Psychosurgery
In the 1930s, Portuguese neurologist Antonio Egas Moniz introduced a surgical procedure designed...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Enhanced Cas12i3 system enables precise OsAUX3 editing for rice grain improvement.

Journal of integrative plant biology·2026

Same author

The potential involvement of FABP4 in rheumatoid arthritis-associated osteoporosis: a comprehensive bioinformatics analysis and experimental validation.

Frontiers in immunology·2026

Same author

Boosting genome editing of non-coding sequences in plants with glycosylase-mediated multi-nucleotide deletion editors.

Science bulletin·2026

Same author

MKT-GMM: A Motion Knowledge Transferring Framework for Robot Trajectory Adaptation to Variable Via-Points.

Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)·2026

Same author

A conserved boundary-specific NAC transcription factor targets various regulators to modulate rice aerial architecture.

The Plant cell·2026

Same author

Vertically Oriented Bismuth Selenide with Exposed Crystal Facets as the Sulfur Host for High-Loading Lithium-Sulfur Batteries.

ACS applied materials & interfaces·2026

Same journal

Optimal Weighted Tests for Replication Studies and the 'Two-Trials Rule' With Multiple Hypotheses.

Statistics in medicine·2026

Same journal

Identifiable Copula-Double-Cox Models: A Fully Parametric Framework for Dependent Right-Censored Survival Data.

Statistics in medicine·2026

Same journal

Moving From Individualized Risk-Based Prevention to Benefit-Based Prevention: Estimating Individualized Life-Years Gained From Prevention Services as a Basis for Eligibility.

Statistics in medicine·2026

Same journal

A Mixture of Distributed Lag Non-Linear Models to Account for Spatially Heterogeneous Exposure-Lag-Response Associations.

Statistics in medicine·2026

Same journal

Practical Considerations for Gaussian Process Modeling for Causal Inference in Quasi-Experimental Studies With Panel Data.

Statistics in medicine·2026

Same journal

Covariate Adjustment for Wilcoxon Two Sample Statistic and Test.

Statistics in medicine·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 3, 2026

Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

Published on: May 19, 2022

Comparing performance of surgeons using risk-adjusted procedures.

Xu Tang¹, Fah F Gan¹

¹Department of Statistics and Applied Probability, National University of Singapore, 6 Science Drive 2, Singapore, 117546.

Statistics in Medicine

|April 25, 2017

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Comparing surgeon performance requires risk adjustment due to varying patient profiles. This study introduces novel risk-adjusted methods and bootstrap procedures for accurate surgeon performance evaluation, moving beyond traditional standardized mortality ratios.

Keywords:

Parsonnet scores bootstrap procedure logistic regression odds ratio risk profiles standardized mortality ratio

More Related Videos

Mixed Reality Assisted Radical Endoscopic Thyroidectomy

Mixed Reality Assisted Radical Endoscopic Thyroidectomy

Published on: January 31, 2025

Technical Detail for Robot Assisted Pancreaticoduodenectomy

Technical Detail for Robot Assisted Pancreaticoduodenectomy

Published on: September 28, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 3, 2026

Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

Published on: May 19, 2022

Mixed Reality Assisted Radical Endoscopic Thyroidectomy

Mixed Reality Assisted Radical Endoscopic Thyroidectomy

Published on: January 31, 2025

Technical Detail for Robot Assisted Pancreaticoduodenectomy

Technical Detail for Robot Assisted Pancreaticoduodenectomy

Published on: September 28, 2019

Area of Science:

Medical Statistics
Surgical Performance Analysis
Health Services Research

Background:

Surgeon performance evaluation using raw success rates is flawed due to differing patient risk profiles.
Traditional standardized mortality ratio (SMR) assumes a population-based definition, limiting its application to individual surgeon performance.
Existing statistical methods for SMR are not directly applicable to random variable scenarios.

Purpose of the Study:

To develop and evaluate novel risk-adjusted statistical procedures for comparing surgeon performance.
To address the limitations of traditional SMR by treating it as a random variable.
To provide statistically sound methods for assessing surgeon performance adjusted for patient risk.

Main Methods:

Development of two new risk-adjusted procedures for surgeon performance comparison.
Derivation of asymptotic distributions for the proposed test statistics.
Utilization of bootstrap procedures to estimate finite-sample distributions for improved accuracy.

Main Results:

The proposed risk-adjusted procedures offer a statistically valid approach to comparing surgeons.
Asymptotic and bootstrap methods provide reliable distributions for test statistics.
The study investigates the probability of type I error and statistical power of the new procedures.

Conclusions:

Risk-adjusted procedures are essential for accurate surgeon performance comparison.
The developed methods provide a robust framework for evaluating surgeons, accounting for patient heterogeneity.
This research offers improved statistical tools for quality assessment in surgical practice.