Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

9.1K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
9.1K
Clinical Trials: Overview01:11

Clinical Trials: Overview

5.2K
Clinical development focuses on how the drug will interact with the human body and encompasses four key phases of clinical trials, each serving a specific purpose in assessing the safety and effectiveness of new drugs. These phases overlap and build upon one another. Phase I involves a small group of healthy volunteers (typically 20-80 individuals) or, in cases where significant toxicity is expected, patients with the targeted disease, such as cancer or AIDS. The volunteers are tested for...
5.2K
Blinding01:11

Blinding

4.0K
Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.
4.0K
Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

26.0K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
26.0K
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs01:20

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

339
Bioequivalence experimental study designs are crucial methodologies used in evaluating and comparing the bioavailability of different drug products. These designs are categorized into various types: completely randomized, randomized block, repeated measures, cross and carry-over, and Latin square designs.Completely randomized designs involve randomly allocating treatments to all subjects participating in the experiment. This allocation is achieved by assigning unique random numbers to subjects...
339
Clinical Trials01:16

Clinical Trials

11.0K
Clinical trials are prospective experimental studies conducted on humans to determine the safety and efficacy of treatments, drugs, diet methods, and medical devices. Using statistics in clinical trials enables researchers to derive reasonable and accurate conclusions from the collected data, allowing them to make wise decisions in uncertain situations. In medical research, statistical methods are crucial for preventing errors and bias.
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
11.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Ethical Challenges in the Delivery of Family-Centered Nursing Care.

Journal of family nursing·2026
Same author

Antiseptic Cleansing to Reduce Vertical Transmission of Pathogens to Neonates: The NeoVT-AMR Randomized Clinical Trial.

JAMA network open·2026
Same author

CMV viraemia is associated with mortality among children with HIV starting antiretroviral therapy in sub-Saharan Africa.

Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America·2026
Same author

Intravenous Artesunate in Artemisinin-Resistant Severe Malaria in Uganda.

The New England journal of medicine·2026
Same author

Multicenter Validation of Clinical Sepsis Phenotypes.

JAMA network open·2026
Same author

Impact of co-amoxiclav versus amoxicillin on the gastrointestinal microbiota in sub-Saharan children hospitalized with pneumonia.

npj antimicrobials and resistance·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 3, 2026

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
06:28

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy

Published on: August 1, 2019

9.3K

A randomized trial comparing concise and standard consent forms in the START trial.

Christine Grady1, Giota Touloumi2, A Sarah Walker3

  • 1Department of Bioethics, NIH Clinical Center, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.

Plos One
|April 27, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Concise consent forms for clinical trials are as effective as standard forms. Simplifying informed consent documents does not impact participant understanding or satisfaction, supporting more efficient research practices.

More Related Videos

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
04:53

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition

Published on: September 20, 2019

11.4K
Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research
07:48

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research

Published on: November 26, 2015

10.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 3, 2026

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
06:28

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy

Published on: August 1, 2019

9.3K
A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
04:53

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition

Published on: September 20, 2019

11.4K
Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research
07:48

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research

Published on: November 26, 2015

10.4K

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Research
  • Informed Consent Process
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Improving research informed consent effectiveness and efficiency is a priority.
  • Concerns exist that lengthy, complex consent forms may hinder participant understanding.
  • Meta-analysis indicated a need for randomized comparisons of consent form effectiveness.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the effectiveness of standard versus concise informed consent forms in a multinational clinical trial.
  • To assess the impact of consent form length on participant comprehension and satisfaction.
  • To determine if concise consent forms are non-inferior to standard forms regarding understanding randomization.

Main Methods:

  • A cluster-randomized non-inferiority trial compared standard and concise consent forms in the START trial (timing of antiretroviral therapy in HIV+ adults).
  • 77 sites used standard consent and 77 sites used concise consent, enrolling 4229 participants.
  • Comprehension of randomization, overall comprehension, satisfaction, and voluntariness were assessed via participant surveys.

Main Results:

  • Concise consent was non-inferior to standard consent for comprehension of randomization (80.2% vs. 82%).
  • No significant differences were observed between groups in total comprehension scores, satisfaction, or voluntariness.
  • Factors like education influenced comprehension and satisfaction, independent of consent form type.

Conclusions:

  • Easier-to-read, concise consent forms do not negatively affect participant comprehension or satisfaction.
  • This study supports the use of more efficient consent forms in clinical research.
  • Simplifying consent documents can enhance the research process without compromising participant understanding.