Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 3, 2026

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control
Published on: July 5, 2015
Neural dynamics underlying varying attentional control facing invariant cognitive task upon invariant stimuli
Yizhou Jiang1, Jing Xia1, Sijie Li1
1Center for Studies of Psychological Application and School of Psychology, South China Normal University, China.
Behavioral performance varies due to attentional control fluctuations. This study links slower response times to altered brain network activity, suggesting optimal attentional control depends on early, not just high, neural activation.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Human Brain Function
- Visuospatial Attention
Background:
- Behavioral performance fluctuates even with invariant tasks and stimuli.
- These fluctuations correlate with changes in attentional control and brain self-organization states.
- Understanding these dynamics is crucial for cognitive neuroscience.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the relationship between response times (RTs), attentional control, and neural activity in the frontoparietal network and default-mode network (DMN).
- To examine how the latency and magnitude of neural activation relate to behavioral performance variations.
- To propose a hypothesis on the optimal working mode of the frontoparietal attentional control system.
Main Methods:
- Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during a visuospatial task with varying spatial scope.
- Analysis of response times (RTs) and corresponding neural activity patterns.
- Comparison of activation/deactivation patterns in frontoparietal and default-mode networks.
Main Results:
- Slower RTs were associated with larger attended spatial areas, indicating higher visuospatial attention demands.
- Within spatial levels, slower RTs correlated with higher but delayed frontoparietal network activation and DMN deactivation.
- Neural activity height and latency in frontoparietal and DMN were dynamically linked, despite their anti-correlation in magnitude.
Conclusions:
- Within-level variations in attentional control correspond to dynamic changes in frontoparietal and DMN activity, affecting both magnitude and timing.
- The frontoparietal and DMN exhibit tight temporal coupling despite opposing activity magnitudes.
- Optimal attentional control may be achieved by early, rather than solely high, frontoparietal network activation.
More Related Videos
13:00Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
Published on: January 23, 2017
06:46Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
Published on: March 18, 2019