Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 3, 2026

Mapping Dysfunctional Protein-Protein Interactions in Disease
Published on: October 24, 2025
Systematic Comparison of False-Discovery-Rate-Controlling Strategies for Proteogenomic Search Using Spike-in
Honglan Li1, Jonghun Park2, Hyunwoo Kim3
1School of Computer Science and Engineering, Soongsil University , Seoul 06978, Republic of Korea.
Abstract:
Proteogenomic searches are useful for novel peptide identification from tandem mass spectra. Usually, separate and multistage approaches are adopted to accurately control the false discovery rate (FDR) for proteogenomic search. Their performance on novel peptide identification has not been thoroughly evaluated, however, mainly due to the difficulty in confirming the existence of identified novel peptides. We simulated a proteogenomic search using a controlled, spike-in proteomic data set. After confirming that the results of the simulated proteogenomic search were similar to those of a real proteogenomic search using a human cell line data set, we evaluated the performance of six FDR control methods-global, separate, and multistage FDR estimation, respectively, coupled to a target-decoy search and a mixture model-based method-on novel peptide identification. The multistage approach showed the highest accuracy for FDR estimation. However, global and separate FDR estimation with the mixture model-based method showed higher sensitivities than others at the same true FDR. Furthermore, the mixture model-based method performed equally well when applied without or with a reduced set of decoy sequences. Considering different prior probabilities for novel and known protein identification, we recommend using mixture model-based methods with separate FDR estimation for sensitive and reliable identification of novel peptides from proteogenomic searches.
More Related Videos
09:52A Clinical Metaproteomics Workflow Implemented within Galaxy Bioinformatics Platform to Analyze Host-Microbiome Interactions Underlying Human Disease
Published on: January 10, 2025
03:08Using Human Differentially Expressed Gene Lists to Perform Downstream Pathway Enrichment Analysis and Target Prioritization
Published on: October 3, 2025