Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 3, 2026

The Use of Reverse Phase Protein Arrays RPPA to Explore Protein Expression Variation within Individual Renal Cell Cancers
Published on: January 22, 2013
A comprehensive analysis of cancer-driving mutations and genes in kidney cancer
Chengmei Long1, Jinbo Jian2, Xinchang Li1
1Department of Organ Transplantation, Jiangxi Provincial People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330006, P.R. China.
Abstract:
An accumulation of driver mutations is important for cancer formation and progression, and leads to the disruption of genes and signaling pathways. The identification of driver mutations and genes has been the subject of numerous previous studies. The present study was performed to identify cancer-driving mutations and genes in renal cell carcinoma (RCC), prioritizing noncoding variants with a high functional impact, in order to analyze the most informative features. Sorting Intolerant From Tolerant (SIFT), Polymorphism Phenotyping version 2 (Polyphen2) and MutationAssessor were applied to predict deleterious mutations in the coding genome. OncodriveFM and OncodriveCLUST were used to detect potential driver genes and signaling pathways. The functional impact of noncoding variants was evaluated using Combined Annotation Dependent Depletion, FunSeq2 and Genome-Wide Annotation of Variants. Noncoding features were analyzed with respect to their enrichment of high-scoring variants. A total of 1,327 coding mutations in clear cell RCC, 258 in chromophobe RCC and 1,186 in papillary RCC were predicted to be deleterious by all three of MutationAssessor, Polyphen2 and SIFT. In total, 77 genes were positively selected by OncodriveFM and 1 by OncodriveCLUST, 45 of which were recurrently mutated genes. In addition, 10 signaling pathways were recurrently mutated and had a high functional impact bias (FM bias), and 31 novel signaling pathways with high FM bias were identified. Furthermore, noncoding regulatory features and conserved regions contained numerous high-scoring variants, and expression, replication time, GC content and recombination rate were positively correlated with the densities of high-scoring variants. In conclusion, the present study identified a list of cancer-driving genes and signaling pathways, features like regulatory elements, conserved regions, replication time, expression, GC content and recombination rate are major factors that affect the distribution of high-scoring non-coding mutations in kidney cancer.
Insights
This study identifies key cancer-driving genes and pathways in kidney cancer (RCC), highlighting the importance of noncoding variants and regulatory features for mutation distribution.
Area of Science:
- Genomics
- Cancer Biology
- Bioinformatics
Background:
- Driver mutations are crucial for cancer development, disrupting genes and signaling pathways.
- Identifying these driver mutations, especially in noncoding regions, is vital for understanding cancer progression.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify cancer-driving mutations and genes in renal cell carcinoma (RCC).
- To prioritize noncoding variants with high functional impact for analysis.
- To analyze informative features influencing mutation distribution.
Main Methods:
- Applied SIFT, Polyphen2, and MutationAssessor for coding mutation prediction.
- Utilized OncodriveFM and OncodriveCLUST for driver gene and pathway identification.
- Evaluated noncoding variant impact using CADD, FunSeq2, and GWAVA; analyzed feature enrichment.
Main Results:
- Identified 1,327 deleterious coding mutations in clear cell RCC, 258 in chromophobe RCC, and 1,186 in papillary RCC.
- Detected 77 positively selected genes (45 recurrently mutated) and 10 recurrently mutated signaling pathways with high FM bias.
- Discovered 31 novel signaling pathways with high FM bias; found noncoding regulatory features and conserved regions enriched with high-scoring variants.
Conclusions:
- Identified cancer-driving genes and signaling pathways in kidney cancer.
- Regulatory elements, conserved regions, replication time, expression, GC content, and recombination rate significantly influence noncoding mutation distribution.
More Related Videos
11:15Next Generation Sequencing for the Detection of Actionable Mutations in Solid and Liquid Tumors
Published on: September 20, 2016
06:38A Syngeneic Mouse Model of Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma for Quantitative and Longitudinal Assessment of Preclinical Therapies
Published on: April 12, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Cancer-Critical Genes II: Tumor Suppressor Genes
When the function of certain critical genes, especially those involved in cell cycle regulation and cell growth signaling cascades, gets disrupted, it upsets the cell cycle progression. Such cells with unchecked cell cycles start proliferating uncontrollably and eventually develop into tumors.
Such genes that act...
Cancer
Cancer-Critical Genes I: Proto-oncogenes
When the function of certain critical genes, especially those involved in cell cycle regulation and cell growth signaling cascades, gets disrupted, it upsets the cell cycle progression. Such cells with unchecked cell cycles start proliferating uncontrollably and eventually develop into tumors.
Such genes that act...
Cancers Originate from Somatic Mutations in a Single Cell
Adaptive Mechanisms in Cancer Cells
Some of the advantages that cancer cells have on normal cells include - enhanced ability to divide without terminally differentiating, induce new blood vessel formation,...
mTOR Signaling and Cancer Progression
The mTOR pathway or the...