Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Background and Environment Affect Phenotype02:27

Background and Environment Affect Phenotype

7.9K
Although the genetic makeup of an organism plays a major role in determining the phenotype, there are also several environmental factors, such as temperature, oxygen availability, presence of mutagens, that can alter an organism’s phenotype.
An example of how genetic background affects phenotype can be seen in horses. The Extension gene in horses is responsible for their coat color. A wild-type gene (EE) produces black pigment in the coat, while a mutant gene (ee) produces red pigment. A...
7.9K
Gene-Environment Interactions01:20

Gene-Environment Interactions

1.3K
Gene expression is a dynamic process that is significantly influenced by environmental factors. This interaction underlies the complex nature of biological development and the phenotypic differences observed among individuals, even among those with identical genetic makeups. Factors such as radiation, temperature, behavior, nutrition, and stress play pivotal roles in determining how genes are expressed. The concept of the reaction range is central to understanding this interaction. It posits...
1.3K
Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS01:11

Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS

16.1K
Genome-wide association studies or GWAS are used to identify whether common SNPs are associated with certain diseases. Suppose specific SNPs are more frequently observed in individuals with a particular disease than those without the disease. In that case, those SNPs are said to be associated with the disease. Chi-square analysis is performed to check the probability of the allele likely to be associated with the disease.
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...
16.1K
Epistasis Analysis01:09

Epistasis Analysis

6.0K
Although Mendel chose seven unrelated traits in peas to study gene segregation, most traits involve multiple gene interactions that create a spectrum of phenotypes. When the interaction of various genes or alleles at different locations influences a phenotype, this is called epistasis. Epistasis often involves one gene masking or interfering with the expression of another (antagonistic epistasis). Epistasis often occurs when different genes are part of the same biochemical pathway. The...
6.0K
Multiple Allele Traits01:49

Multiple Allele Traits

38.4K
The Concept of Multiple Allelism
38.4K
Monohybrid Crosses01:20

Monohybrid Crosses

240.1K
Overview
240.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Missing comparability: When genomic selection faces field variability. A case study in soybeans.

The plant genome·2026
Same author

Yield Performance, Combining Ability and Stability of Early- to Medium-Maturing Doubled-Haploid Maize Lines in Eastern Africa.

Plant breeding = Zeitschrift fur Pflanzenzuchtung·2026
Same author

Performance of doubled haploid maize (Zea mays L.) testcross hybrids under optimal and drought-stressed environments.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Multimodal genomic prediction is not a buzzword: why modern plant breeding must integrate genomics, enviromics, and phenomics.

G3 (Bethesda, Md.)·2026
Same author

Classification-based genomic prediction for early identification of high-yielding and stable soybean genotypes.

Frontiers in plant science·2026
Same author

Evolutionary structure constrains genomic prediction accuracy more than model complexity in mango (Mangifera indica L.).

G3 (Bethesda, Md.)·2026
Same journal

Duplication-based genetic dissection of the Down syndrome critical region reveals its complex functional organization.

G3 (Bethesda, Md.)·2026
Same journal

The complete sequence of the silkworm W chromosome uncovers its rapid evolution by large-scale duplications/deletions and translocation of W-linked genes.

G3 (Bethesda, Md.)·2026
Same journal

Revisiting the genome assembly of Lupinus species reveals differential diploidization after a shared whole-genome duplication.

G3 (Bethesda, Md.)·2026
Same journal

Deconstructing empirical fitness seascapes across scales of granularity.

G3 (Bethesda, Md.)·2026
Same journal

Genomes of Conopholis americana and Epifagus virginiana: Two holoparasitic plants (Orobanchaceae).

G3 (Bethesda, Md.)·2026
Same journal

"A chromosome-level reference genome for the colonial marine hydrozoan Podocoryna americana".

G3 (Bethesda, Md.)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 3, 2026

Imaging and Analysis for Quantifying Maize (Zea mays) Abiotic Stress Phenotypes
06:41

Imaging and Analysis for Quantifying Maize (Zea mays) Abiotic Stress Phenotypes

Published on: March 28, 2025

1.8K

Genomic-Enabled Prediction in Maize Using Kernel Models with Genotype × Environment Interaction.

Massaine Bandeira E Sousa1, Jaime Cuevas2, Evellyn Giselly de Oliveira Couto1

  • 1Department of Genetics, Luiz de Queiroz College of Agriculture, University of São Paulo, Piracicaba, 13418-900 Brazil.

G3 (Bethesda, Md.)
|April 30, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The study found that multi-environment, environment-specific variance deviation models (MDe) and single variance deviation models (MDs) using the Gaussian kernel (GK) achieved the highest prediction accuracy in maize breeding. These models significantly improved prediction accuracy over standard methods, especially for grain yield.

Keywords:
Gaussian nonlinear kernelGenPredGenomic Best Linear Unbiased Predictor (GBLUP) linear kernelGenomic SelectionGenotype× Environment interaction (G×E)Shared Data Resources

More Related Videos

A Telemetric, Gravimetric Platform for Real-Time Physiological Phenotyping of Plant–Environment Interactions
15:30

A Telemetric, Gravimetric Platform for Real-Time Physiological Phenotyping of Plant–Environment Interactions

Published on: August 5, 2020

12.7K
High-throughput, Microscale Protocol for the Analysis of Processing Parameters and Nutritional Qualities in Maize Zea mays L.
05:55

High-throughput, Microscale Protocol for the Analysis of Processing Parameters and Nutritional Qualities in Maize Zea mays L.

Published on: June 16, 2018

7.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 3, 2026

Imaging and Analysis for Quantifying Maize (Zea mays) Abiotic Stress Phenotypes
06:41

Imaging and Analysis for Quantifying Maize (Zea mays) Abiotic Stress Phenotypes

Published on: March 28, 2025

1.8K
A Telemetric, Gravimetric Platform for Real-Time Physiological Phenotyping of Plant–Environment Interactions
15:30

A Telemetric, Gravimetric Platform for Real-Time Physiological Phenotyping of Plant–Environment Interactions

Published on: August 5, 2020

12.7K
High-throughput, Microscale Protocol for the Analysis of Processing Parameters and Nutritional Qualities in Maize Zea mays L.
05:55

High-throughput, Microscale Protocol for the Analysis of Processing Parameters and Nutritional Qualities in Maize Zea mays L.

Published on: June 16, 2018

7.5K

Area of Science:

  • Plant breeding and genetics
  • Quantitative genetics
  • Agricultural science

Background:

  • Multi-environment trials are crucial for selecting superior genotypes in plant breeding.
  • Genomic prediction models aim to improve selection efficiency by utilizing marker data.
  • Understanding genotype-by-environment (G×E) interactions is key for accurate predictions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the prediction accuracy of four genomic-enabled prediction models.
  • To evaluate the performance of linear (GBLUP) and nonlinear (Gaussian kernel) methods.
  • To assess model performance across different traits and datasets in maize.

Main Methods:

  • Fitted single-environment (SM), multi-environment (MM), multi-environment single variance G×E deviation (MDs), and multi-environment environment-specific variance G×E deviation (MDe) models.
  • Utilized linear kernel Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Predictor (GBLUP) and nonlinear kernel Gaussian kernel (GK).
  • Applied eight model-method combinations to Brazilian maize datasets (HEL and USP) for grain yield, plant height, and ear height.

Main Results:

  • Multi-environment models with Gaussian kernel (MDe-GK, MDs-GK) showed the highest prediction accuracy.
  • Gaussian kernel improved prediction accuracy over GBLUP, particularly for grain yield (up to 70% increase in USP dataset).
  • Gains in prediction accuracy were smaller for plant and ear height and decreased with more challenging prediction scenarios.

Conclusions:

  • Multi-environment models incorporating G×E interactions, especially with a Gaussian kernel, enhance prediction accuracy in maize breeding.
  • The choice of model and kernel method significantly impacts prediction performance.
  • These findings can guide the development of more effective genomic selection strategies.