Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Incentive Theory: Pull Theory of Motivation

Incentive Theory: Pull Theory of Motivation

Incentive theory, or the "pull theory" of motivation, suggests that external rewards primarily drive behavior. Individuals are motivated to engage in activities when they anticipate a desirable outcome. This is why people often work hard for promotions or study intensively to achieve high grades. These incentives can be tangible, physical rewards such as money or promotions, or intangible, non-physical rewards like praise and social recognition.
The theory differentiates between...

Social Loafing

Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...

Impact of Individuals on a Group

Impact of Individuals on a Group

In social psychology, the interplay between individuals and groups is a central concern, particularly regarding how individual actions and characteristics influence group processes and outcomes. While much research emphasizes the group's power in shaping individual behavior, it is equally significant to understand how individuals contribute to the functioning, development, and success of groups.Individual Roles in Group Productivity and Decision-MakingIndividuals are not passive participants in...

Social Proof

Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.

Environmental Influences on Intelligence

Environmental Influences on Intelligence

Despite the strong genetic influence on traits like intelligence, environmental factors significantly shape outcomes. For example, while over 90% of height variation is due to genetic differences, environmental factors such as nutrition also have a notable impact. Similarly, for intelligence, changes in a child's surroundings can significantly alter their IQ. Research shows that enriched environments boost children's academic success and help them develop key cognitive skills. Children...

Optimal Foraging

Optimal Foraging

How animals obtain and eat their food is called foraging behavior. Foraging can include searching for plants and hunting for prey and depends on the species and environment.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Large cities lose their growth advantage as countries urbanize.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026

Same author

The wisdom of crowds emerges in flocks of thousands of migrating songbirds.

Science advances·2026

Same author

Chimpanzees spontaneously prepare for mutually exclusive possibilities, and collective context strengthens this behaviour.

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2026

Same author

Revisiting big data optimism: risks of data-driven black box algorithms for society.

Ethics and information technology·2026

Same author

Dynamic calibration of low-cost PM<sub>2.5</sub> sensors using trust-based consensus mechanisms.

NPJ climate and atmospheric science·2025

Same author

Co-creating the future: participatory cities and digital governance.

Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences·2024

Same journal

In This Issue.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026

Same journal

Correction for Otsuki et al., Extracellular sulfatases support cartilage homeostasis by regulating BMP and FGF signaling pathways.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026

Same journal

Hive mind: Microbial communities and the making of memory.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026

Same journal

Targets for disease modification in schizophrenia: New findings add to evidence for the involvement of the immune complement system.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026

Same journal

Correction for Wang et al., The role of reduced aerosol masking from air pollutant emission reductions in recent global warming acceleration (2013-2023).

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026

Same journal

Correction for Mishra, Ecology is not yet ready for AI-and why that matters.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 3, 2026

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

Optimal incentives for collective intelligence.

Richard P Mann¹, Dirk Helbing²

¹Department of Statistics, School of Mathematics, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom; r.p.mann@leeds.ac.uk.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

|May 3, 2017

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Rewarding accurate minority predictions boosts collective intelligence. Incentive systems that reward accurate minority predictions, rather than majority ones, enhance group performance and diversity.

Keywords:

collective intelligence democracy diversity game theory markets

More Related Videos

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 3, 2026

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

Area of Science:

Social Psychology
Behavioral Economics
Computational Social Science

Background:

Collective intelligence, crucial for group performance, relies on member diversity.
Social pressure to conform can reduce diversity, hindering collective intelligence.
Understanding incentive structures is key to maintaining diversity in groups.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate how incentive systems influence diversity and collective intelligence.
To model the effects of different incentive schemes on group prediction accuracy.
To propose an optimal incentive structure for fostering collective intelligence.

Main Methods:

Utilized an evolutionary game-theoretic model.
Simulated collective prediction scenarios with varying incentive structures.
Analyzed the impact of incentives on diversity and predictive accuracy.

Main Results:

Market-based incentives led to herding behavior, reduced information diversity, and decreased collective intelligence.
An incentive scheme rewarding accurate minority predictions optimized diversity and collective predictive accuracy.
The model demonstrated that rewarding accurate minority predictions counteracts conformity pressures.

Conclusions:

Incentive systems significantly impact group diversity and collective intelligence.
Rewarding accurate minority predictions is more effective than market-based systems for enhancing group performance.
Real-world systems should consider rewarding accurate predictions, especially when the majority is incorrect, to foster optimal diversity and intelligence.