Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 3, 2026

Author Spotlight: Unveiling the Connection Between Sleep Disorders and Cognitive Symptoms in Depression
Published on: April 26, 2024
Two-Step Screening for Depressive Symptoms and Prediction of Mortality in Patients With Heart Failure
Kyoung Suk Lee1, Debra K Moser2, Michele Pelter2
1Kyoung Suk Lee is an assistant professor, Chungnam National University, College of Nursing, Dea Jeon, South Korea. Debra K. Moser is a professor and holds the Linda C. Gill Endowed Chair of Nursing, and Martha J. Biddle is an assistant professor, University of Kentucky, College of Nursing, Lexington, Kentucky. Michele Pelter is an assistant professor, and Kathleen Dracup is a professor and dean emeritus, School of Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California. kslee14@cnu.ac.kr.
Background:
Comorbid depression in patients with heart failure is associated with increased risk for death. In order to effectively identify depressed patients with cardiac disease, the American Heart Association suggests a 2-step screening method: administering the 2-item Patient Health Questionnaire first and then the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire. However, whether the 2-step method is better for predicting poor prognosis in heart failure than is either the 2-item or the 9-item tool alone is not known.
Objective:
To determine whether the 2-step method is better than either the 2-item or the 9-item questionnaire alone for predicting all-cause mortality in heart failure.
Methods:
During a 2-year period, 562 patients with heart failure were assessed for depression by using the 2-step method. With the 2-step method, results are considered positive if patients endorse either depressed mood or anhedonia on the 2-item screen and have scores of 10 or higher on the 9-item screen.
Results:
Screening results with the 2-step method were not associated with all-cause mortality. Patients with scores positive for depression on either the 2-item or 9-item screen alone had 53% and 60% greater risk, respectively, for all-cause death than did patients with scores negative for depression after adjustments for covariates (hazard ratio, 1.530; 95% CI, 1.029-2.274 for the 2-item screen; hazard ratio, 1.603; 95% CI, 1.079-2.383 for the 9-item screen).
Conclusions:
The 2-step method has no clear advantages compared with the 2-item screen alone or the 9-item screen alone for predicting adverse prognostic effects of depressive symptoms in heart failure.
More Related Videos
05:53Measuring Frailty in HIV-infected Individuals. Identification of Frail Patients is the First Step to Amelioration and Reversal of Frailty
Published on: July 24, 2013
05:16Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure
Published on: June 10, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure VII: Nursing Interventions
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Mitral Regurgitation IV: Nursing Management
Heart Failure III: Clinical Manifestations