Clinical outcomes of proximal row carpectomy by preoperative midcarpal joint morphological classification: Viegas...

The midcarpal joint can be classified into two anatomical types - Viegas type I and Viegas type II - based on the absence or presence of a medial facet for the hamate on the lunate (lunohamate facet). Type I is associated with a round capitate shape, which theoretically allows better congruence with the lunate fossa of the distal radius following proximal row carpectomy (PRC). This morphological feature has never been considered as a predictive factor of clinical outcome for this surgical procedure. This study aimed to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of the two Viegas types following PRC. A retrospective single-center study was carried out on patients who underwent PRC for wrist osteoarthritis. Minimum follow-up was 2 years. Lunate type was determined based on preoperative CT arthrography. The clinical evaluation included range of motion (ROM) and strength as well as the functional DASH, Mayo Wrist scores and a VAS for pain. The outcome of radiocapitate osteoarthritis was assessed on plain radiographs. Forty patients were reviewed with a mean follow-up of 57 months. Twenty-one Viegas type I and 19 Viegas type II were identified on preoperative CT arthrography. The etiologies included 23 SLAC wrists (12 Viegas type I, 11 type II), 8 SNAC wrists (4 Viegas type I, 4 type II), 6 cases of Kienböck's disease (3 type IIIa, 3 type IIIb with 3 Viegas type I and 3 type II), 1 Preiser's disease and 2 cases of transscaphoid perilunate dislocation of the carpus. Patients with a Viegas type I lunate had significantly greater flexion-extension ROM: 83.5° vs. 71° (P=0.04) and radial deviation: 12° vs. 7° (P=0.013) than those with Viegas type II. However, three cases of complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) were reported in the Viegas type II group vs. zero in the Viegas type I group. There were no differences between the two groups in terms of strength, functional scores or VAS pain. The outcome of radiocapitate osteoarthritis was similar in both groups. Considering the number of CRPS cases in the Viegas type II group and similar functional results in both groups, the worse outcomes of the Viegas type II patients in terms of ROM cannot be considered as clinically relevant. This comparative study does not provide a reasonable basis for concluding that Viegas type I patients are better candidates for PRC than Viegas type II patients.