Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Distributions to Estimate Population Parameter01:26

Distributions to Estimate Population Parameter

5.3K
The accurate values of population parameters such as population proportion, population mean, and population standard deviation (or variance) are usually unknown. These are fixed values that can only be estimated from the data collected from the samples. The estimates of each of these parameters are sample proportion, the sample mean, and sample standard deviation (or variance). To obtain the values of these sample statistics, data are required that have particular distribution and central...
5.3K
Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation01:22

Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation

8.9K
In practice, we rarely know the population standard deviation. In the past, when the sample size was large, this did not present a problem to statisticians. They used the sample standard deviation s as an estimate for σ and proceeded as before to calculate a confidence interval with close enough results. However, statisticians ran into problems when the sample size was small. A small sample size caused inaccuracies in the confidence interval.
William S. Gosset (1876–1937) of the...
8.9K
Estimating Population Standard Deviation01:26

Estimating Population Standard Deviation

3.4K
When the population standard deviation is unknown and the sample size is large, the sample standard deviation s is commonly used as a point estimate of σ. However, it can sometimes under or overestimate the population standard deviation. To overcome this drawback, confidence intervals are determined to estimate population parameters and eliminate any calculation bias accurately. However, this only applies to random samples from normally distributed populations. Knowing the sample mean and...
3.4K
Estimating Population Mean with Known Standard Deviation01:16

Estimating Population Mean with Known Standard Deviation

9.8K
To construct a confidence interval for a single unknown population mean μ, where the population standard deviation is known, we need sample mean as an estimate for μ and we need the margin of error. Here, the margin of error (EBM) is called the error bound for a population mean (abbreviated EBM). The sample mean is the point estimate of the unknown population mean μ.
The confidence interval estimate will have the form as follows:
(point estimate - error bound, point estimate +...
9.8K
What are Populations and Communities?00:30

What are Populations and Communities?

38.2K
Overview
38.2K
Censoring Survival Data01:09

Censoring Survival Data

610
Survival analysis is a statistical method used to analyze time-to-event data, often employed in fields such as medicine, engineering, and social sciences. One of the key challenges in survival analysis is dealing with incomplete data, a phenomenon known as "censoring." Censoring occurs when the event of interest (such as death, relapse, or system failure) has not occurred for some individuals by the end of the study period or is otherwise unobservable, and it might have many different...
610

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Re: re: Two-week rule: suspected head and neck cancer referrals from a general medical practice perspective.

The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery·2021
Same author

Comparison of primary care doctors and dentists in the referral of oral cancer: a systematic review.

The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery·2020
Same author

Radiotherapy without tattoos: Could this work?

Radiography (London, England : 1995)·2020
Same author

Audit of the two-week pathway for patients with suspected cancer of the head and neck and the influence of socioeconomic status.

The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery·2019
Same author

Referrals for head and neck cancer in England and The Netherlands: an international qualitative study of the views of secondary-care surgical specialists.

The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery·2019
Same author

Falls in older people: comparing older and younger fallers in a developing country.

European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society·2017
Same journal

Unveiling the microhabitat puzzle: how spatial heterogeneity shapes cave invertebrate biodiversity across scales.

Oecologia·2026
Same journal

Soil microbial drought history affects physiological response of select tree species to drought stress.

Oecologia·2026
Same journal

Unveiling the effects of interspecific competition: ecological consequences of competitive release after damming on Salvelinus curilus populations in a three-salmonid species coexistence system.

Oecologia·2026
Same journal

Orchid bee diversity responds positively to forest cover and landscape heterogeneity in the Brazilian Savanna.

Oecologia·2026
Same journal

The impact of native vertebrates on enemy release and plant functional traits during community assembly.

Oecologia·2026
Same journal

Nutrient fluctuations alter effects of litter diversity of invasive species on native communities.

Oecologia·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 3, 2026

Development of New Methods for Quantifying Fish Density Using Underwater Stereo-video Tools
09:32

Development of New Methods for Quantifying Fish Density Using Underwater Stereo-video Tools

Published on: November 20, 2017

9.9K

The estimation of density dependence using census data from several sites.

S Langton1, N Aebischer2, P Robertson3

  • 1DEFRA Central Science Laboratory, Sand Hutton, York, YO41 1LZ, UK. Steve.D.Langton@defra.gsi.gov.uk.

Oecologia
|May 4, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Estimating ecological density dependence is crucial. The restricted maximum likelihood (REML) method provides accurate estimates, especially when data from multiple sites are combined, improving ecological modeling.

Keywords:
Gompertz modelMaximum likelihoodREML

More Related Videos

Automatic Image Processing to Determine the Community Size Structure of Riverine Macroinvertebrates
08:56

Automatic Image Processing to Determine the Community Size Structure of Riverine Macroinvertebrates

Published on: January 13, 2023

2.9K
Author Spotlight: Advancements in X-ray CT Tool Chain for Tree Core Analysis
06:56

Author Spotlight: Advancements in X-ray CT Tool Chain for Tree Core Analysis

Published on: September 22, 2023

1.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 3, 2026

Development of New Methods for Quantifying Fish Density Using Underwater Stereo-video Tools
09:32

Development of New Methods for Quantifying Fish Density Using Underwater Stereo-video Tools

Published on: November 20, 2017

9.9K
Automatic Image Processing to Determine the Community Size Structure of Riverine Macroinvertebrates
08:56

Automatic Image Processing to Determine the Community Size Structure of Riverine Macroinvertebrates

Published on: January 13, 2023

2.9K
Author Spotlight: Advancements in X-ray CT Tool Chain for Tree Core Analysis
06:56

Author Spotlight: Advancements in X-ray CT Tool Chain for Tree Core Analysis

Published on: September 22, 2023

1.7K

Area of Science:

  • Ecology
  • Population Dynamics
  • Statistical Ecology

Background:

  • Ecological studies often prioritize significance testing over accurate estimation of density dependence.
  • Accurate estimation of density dependence is vital for understanding population dynamics and informing conservation strategies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the accuracy and precision of different methods for estimating density dependence using simulation.
  • To evaluate the impact of sample size and number of sites on estimation accuracy.
  • To introduce and demonstrate the restricted (or residual) maximum likelihood (REML) method for density dependence estimation.

Main Methods:

  • Simulations were used to assess bias and precision of maximum likelihood, regression, and REML methods.
  • REML method was investigated for its accuracy with varying parameter combinations.
  • Further simulations explored the relationship between REML estimation accuracy and sample size (number of sites and years of data).

Main Results:

  • The REML method demonstrated the most accurate estimates with negligible bias across most parameter combinations.
  • Combining data from multiple sites significantly improved estimation accuracy.
  • More than five sites offered diminishing returns in accuracy unless over 10 years of data were available per site.
  • Bootstrapping methods (site-level, parametric, or randomization tests) are suggested for standard error estimation.

Conclusions:

  • The REML method offers a robust and easily implementable approach for estimating density dependence.
  • Combining data from multiple sites substantially enhances the accuracy of density dependence estimates.
  • The study provides practical guidance on optimizing data collection (number of sites and years) for reliable ecological parameter estimation.