Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 3, 2026

06:48
The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
Published on: January 19, 2019
9.9K
Planning and Performance in Small Groups: Collective Implementation Intentions Enhance Group Goal Striving
J Lukas Thürmer1,2,3, Frank Wieber3,4, Peter M Gollwitzer3,5
1Department of Politics and Public Administration, University of KonstanzKonstanz, Germany.
Frontiers in Psychology
|May 5, 2017
Summary
Group motivation hinges on indispensability and identifiability. Collective goals (We-plans) require cooperation, while individual goals (I-plans) do not, impacting small group performance strategies.
Area of Science:
- Social Psychology
- Organizational Behavior
- Group Dynamics
Background:
- Group performance is influenced by individual motivation and group dynamics.
- Two key motivators for group performance are indispensability (crucial contribution) and identifiability (recognition by others).
- Indispensability promotes collective goals ('We' goals), while identifiability promotes individual goals ('I' goals).
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how collective ('We') and individual ('I') goals, facilitated by specific implementation intentions, influence group performance and interaction strategies.
- To examine the role of cooperation and communication in the effectiveness of collective implementation intentions (cIIs) versus individual implementation intentions (IIs).
Main Methods:
- Two experiments were conducted using a physical persistence task with three-member groups.
- Groups formed either collective or individual goals, followed by planning using collective implementation intentions (cIIs), individual implementation intentions (IIs), or control plans.
- Experiment 2 manipulated communication to test its role in the effectiveness of cIIs.
Main Results:
- Both cIIs and IIs improved performance on the persistence task compared to control groups.
- Groups using cIIs exhibited higher levels of cooperation during the task than groups using IIs.
- Hindering communication significantly impaired the performance of groups using cIIs, but not IIs, highlighting the importance of communication for cII effectiveness.
Conclusions:
- Collective goals, planned with cIIs, rely on and foster cooperation, making them sensitive to communication.
- Individual goals, planned with IIs, are less reliant on cooperation and communication for performance enhancement.
- The study provides a psychology of action framework for understanding small group performance, emphasizing the distinct mechanisms of collective versus individual goal pursuit.
Related Concept Videos
Robbers Cave
14.9K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
14.9K
Social Loafing
39.8K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
39.8K
Impact of Individuals on a Group
383
In social psychology, the interplay between individuals and groups is a central concern, particularly regarding how individual actions and characteristics influence group processes and outcomes. While much research emphasizes the group's power in shaping individual behavior, it is equally significant to understand how individuals contribute to the functioning, development, and success of groups.Individual Roles in Group Productivity and Decision-MakingIndividuals are not passive participants in...
383
Impression Management Techniques III: Aligning Actions
170
Aligning actions are communicative strategies individuals employ to maintain social harmony and preserve personal identity in the face of potential disruptions to social norms. These actions are particularly important in managing social impressions when one's behavior might be seen as inappropriate, incompetent, or morally questionable.Types of Aligning ActionsThe three principal types of aligning actions are disclaimers, accounts, and apologies.DisclaimersDisclaimers are preventive; they are...
170
Persuasion Strategies
43.7K
Researchers have tested many persuasion strategies, including the foot-in-the door and the door-in-the-face techniques, in a variety of contexts. Ultimately, the principles are effective in selling products and changing people’s attitude, ideas, and behaviors (Cialdini & Goldstein, 2004).
43.7K
Impact of Groups on Individuals
422
Groups play a fundamental role in shaping individual behavior, as they establish norms that guide interactions and decision-making. Social psychology examines how individuals conform to group expectations, often adjusting their attitudes and actions to align with group norms. These norms can be formal, such as workplace policies, or informal, such as unspoken social expectations within a fraternity.Conformity and Social InfluenceConformity arises when individuals modify their behaviors or...
422

