Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 3, 2026

Easy Measurement of Diffusion Coefficients of EGFP-tagged Plasma Membrane Proteins Using k-Space Image Correlation Spectroscopy
Published on: May 10, 2014
Non-gaussian diffusion evaluation of the human kidney by Padé exponent model
Alexandra Ljimani1, Rotem S Lanzman1, Anja Müller-Lutz1
1University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Dusseldorf, Germany.
Purpose:
To evaluate the feasibility of renal diffusion quantification using the Padé exponent model (PEM) in healthy subjects.
Materials And Methods:
Diffusion measurements were completed in 10 healthy subjects (mean age, 32.4 ± 8.9 years) on a 3T MRI scanner (Magnetom Trio, Siemens AG, Germany). A respiratory-triggered echo planar imaging sequence (15 slices with 6 mm thickness; 16 b-values [0-750 s/mm2 ]; three diffusion directions; field of view: 400 × 375 mm; Matrix 192 × 192; repetition time/echo time: 3000/74 ms) was acquired in the coronal direction. Parameter maps were calculated for the monoexponential, biexponential, kurtosis models, and the PEM. A regression analysis using an R2 -test and corrected Akaike information criterion (AICc) was performed to identify the best mathematical fitting to the measured diffusion-weighted imaging signal decay.
Results:
The mathematical accuracy of the PEM was significantly higher than for the other three-parameter and the monoexponential model (P < 0.05), which enables more precise information about the deviation of the Gaussian behavior of the diffusion signal by the PEM. The biexponential model showed better fitting to the diffusion signal (medullar Rbi2 0.989 ± 0.008, AICcbi 113.3 ± 6.6; cortical Rbi2 0.992 ± 0.006, AICcbi 113.3 ± 5.2) than the three-parameter models (medullar RPadé2 0.965 ± 0.016, AICcPadé 122.6 ± 6.4, RK2 0.954 ± 0.019, AICcK 128.5 ± 6.0; cortical RPadé2 0.989 ± 0.005, AICcPadé 116.3 ± 4.4, RK2 0.985 ± 0.007, AICcK 120.4 ± 4.8). The monoexponential model fits least to the diffusion signal in the kidney (medullar Rmono2 0.898 ± 0.039, AICcmono 141.4 ± 5.6; cortical Rmono2 0.961 ± 0.013, AICcmono 135.4 ± 4.8).
Conclusion:
The PEM is a novel promising approach to quantify diffusion properties in the human kidney and might further improve functional renal MR imaging.
Level Of Evidence:
1 Technical Efficacy: Stage 1 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018;47:160-167.
More Related Videos
11:13Quantifying Glomerular Permeability of Fluorescent Macromolecules Using 2-Photon Microscopy in Munich Wistar Rats
Published on: April 17, 2013
10:33A Method for Determination and Simulation of Permeability and Diffusion in a 3D Tissue Model in a Membrane Insert System for Multi-well Plates
Published on: February 23, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Physiological Pharmacokinetic Models: Blood Flow-Limited Versus Diffusion-Limited Models
Drug Dosing in Renal Diseases: Estimation of Glomerular Filtration Rate Based on Serum Creatinine Concentration
One-Compartment Open Model: Urinary Excretion Data and Determination of k
Renal Drug Clearance: Comparison Between Renal Excretion Methods
Renal clearance is often associated with the renal glomerular filtration rate (GFR), which represents the rate at which plasma is filtered through the glomeruli in the kidney. When drug reabsorption is minimal and there is no active secretion, renal clearance is closely related to the...
Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Distributed Parameter Models
The distributed parameter models are specifically designed to account for variations and differences in some drug classes. This model is particularly useful for assessing regional concentrations of anticancer or...
Determination of Renal Drug Clearance: Graphical and Midpoint Methods
The graphical method involves plotting the rate of drug excretion in urine against the plasma drug concentration. By analyzing the graph, the clearance can be calculated and obtained. Drugs rapidly excreted by the kidneys exhibit a...