Laparoscopic Appendectomy in Children With Perforated Appendicitis: A Meta-Analysis

Shun Zhang1, Tao Du, Xiaohua Jiang

  • 1Gastrointestinal Surgery, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, P.R. China.

Insights

Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) in children with perforated appendicitis shows fewer wound infections and bowel obstructions compared to open appendectomy (OA). However, LA was linked to a higher rate of intra-abdominal abscesses.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Surgery
  • Gastrointestinal Surgery
  • Evidence-Based Medicine

Background:

  • Perforated appendicitis is a common surgical emergency in children.
  • Surgical management strategies vary, impacting patient outcomes.
  • Comparing laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) and open appendectomy (OA) is crucial for optimizing pediatric care.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To conduct a meta-analysis comparing surgical procedures for perforated appendicitis in pediatric patients.
  • To evaluate the influence of laparoscopic appendectomy versus open appendectomy on postoperative outcomes.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic literature search across multiple databases (PubMed, Embase, Ovid, Cochrane, Web of Science).
  • Independent quality assessment and data extraction by two reviewers.
  • Meta-analysis using fixed-effect models to calculate relative risk (RR) for postoperative variables.

Main Results:

  • Nine studies were included in the meta-analysis.
  • Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) showed a statistically significant lower risk for wound infection (RR=0.88) and bowel obstruction (RR=0.79).
  • LA was associated with a statistically significant higher risk for intra-abdominal abscess (RR=1.38) compared to open appendectomy (OA).

Conclusions:

  • Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) is associated with reduced rates of wound infections and bowel obstruction in pediatric perforated appendicitis.
  • Open appendectomy (OA) may be associated with a lower incidence of intra-abdominal abscesses.
  • The choice between LA and OA requires careful consideration of potential risks and benefits in pediatric patients.
Abstract