Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 3, 2026

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
Published on: August 9, 2024
ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Chronic Chest Pain-High Probability of Coronary Artery Disease
, Scott R Akers1, Vandan Panchal2
1Principal Author, VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Insights
Advanced imaging is crucial for diagnosing coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with chest pain. It guides treatment decisions and predicts long-term prognosis by assessing heart function and identifying blockages.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Imaging
- Diagnostic Medicine
Background:
- Chronic chest pain often indicates high probability of coronary artery disease (CAD).
- Accurate diagnosis of CAD requires comprehensive assessment of myocardial ischemia, scarring, and coronary lesions.
- Clinical risk stratification is essential for determining pretest probability of CAD.
Purpose of the Study:
- To outline the diverse and major roles of imaging in evaluating patients with chronic chest pain and high likelihood of CAD.
- To emphasize the importance of imaging in guiding management strategies and predicting prognosis.
- To highlight the utility of imaging in identifying non-atherosclerotic causes of angina.
Main Methods:
- Utilizing American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria, which are evidence-based guidelines.
- Applying methodologies like RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and GRADE for evaluating imaging procedures.
- Reviewing current medical literature and incorporating expert opinion when evidence is equivocal.
Main Results:
- Imaging identifies the presence, extent, and severity of myocardial ischemia, hibernation, and scarring.
- It visualizes obstructive coronary lesions, guiding decisions for medical therapy, angioplasty/stenting, or surgery.
- Imaging assesses ventricular function, diastolic relaxation, and end-systolic volume for long-term prognosis and therapeutic benefit evaluation.
Conclusions:
- Imaging plays a pivotal role in diagnosing and managing chronic chest pain in patients with suspected CAD.
- It is essential for determining appropriate treatment pathways and predicting patient outcomes.
- Imaging can also detect other cardiac abnormalities causing angina, independent of atherosclerotic disease.
Abstract:
In patients with chronic chest pain in the setting of high probability of coronary artery disease (CAD), imaging has major and diverse roles. First, imaging is valuable in determining and documenting the presence, extent, and severity of myocardial ischemia, hibernation, scarring, and/or the presence, site, and severity of obstructive coronary lesions. Second, imaging findings are important in determining the course of management of patients with suspected chronic myocardial ischemia and better defining those patients best suited for medical therapy, angioplasty/stenting, or surgery. Third, imaging is also necessary to determine the long-term prognosis and likely benefit from various therapeutic options by evaluating ventricular function, diastolic relaxation, and end-systolic volume. Imaging studies are also required to demonstrate other abnormalities, such as congenital/acquired coronary anomalies and severe left ventricular hypertrophy, that can produce angina in the absence of symptomatic coronary obstructive disease due to atherosclerosis. Clinical risk assessment is necessary to determine the pretest probability of CAD. Multiple methods are available to categorize patients as low, medium, or high risk for developing CAD. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Angina III: Clinical Manifestations and Assessment
Coronary Artery Disease III: Clinical Manifestations
Acute Coronary Syndrome V: Nursing Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT

