Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 3, 2026
Physical Activity Measurement in Children Accepting Table Tennis Training
Published on: July 27, 2022
A Domain-Specific Approach for Assessing Physical Activity Efficacy in Adolescents: From Scale Conception to
Nerissa Campbell1, Casey Gray1, Louise Foley2
1The Exercise and Health Psychology Laboratory, The University of Western Ontario London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 3K7.
Objective:
To develop and test the utility of a domain-specific physical activity efficacy scale in adolescents for predicting physical activity behaviour.
Design:
Two independent studies were conducted. Study 1 examined the psychometric properties of a newly constructed Domain-Specific Physical Activity Efficacy Questionnaire (DSPAEQ) and study 2 tested the utility of the scale for predicting leisure- and school-time physical activity.
Methods:
In study 1, descriptive physical activity data were used to generate scale items. The scales factor structure and internal consistency were tested in a sample of 272 adolescents. A subsequent sample of Canadian (N = 104) and New Zealand (N = 29) adolescents, was recruited in study 2 to explore the scale's predictive validity using a subjective measure of leisure- and school-time physical activity.
Results:
A principle axis factor analysis in study 1 revealed a 26-item, five-factor coherent and interpretable solution; representative of leisure and recreation, household, ambulatory, transportation, and school physical activity efficacy constructs, respectively. The five-factor solution explained 81% of the response variance. In study 2 the domain-specific efficacy model explained 16% and 1% of leisure- and school-time physical activity response variance, respectively, with leisure time physical activity efficacy identified as a unique and significant contributor of leisure-time physical activity.
Conclusion:
Study 1 provides evidence for the tenability of a five factor DSPEAQ, while study 2 shows that the DSPEAQ has utility in predicting domain-specific physical activity. This latter finding underscores the importance of scale correspondence between the behavioral elements (leisure-time physical activity) and cognitive assessment of those elements (leisure-time physical activity efficacy).
