Iliac Artery Stenting Combined with Ipsilateral Open Femoro-Popliteal Revascularization and Its Effect on Bypass
Michele Piazza1, Francesco Squizzato1, Sandro Lepidi1
1Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Clinic, Padova University, School of Medicine, Padova, Italy.
Insights
Hybrid iliac artery stenting and femoro-popliteal bypass (IS-FPB) shows good outcomes for multilevel disease. Covered stents (CS) in the iliac arteries improve patency in this combined procedure.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Interventional Cardiology
- Endovascular Therapy
Background:
- Multilevel obstructive atherosclerotic disease requires complex treatment strategies.
- Hybrid procedures combining iliac artery stenting and femoro-popliteal bypass (IS-FPB) are an option, but outcomes need further clarification.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the early and long-term outcomes of concurrent IS-FPB.
- To identify predictors of patency in patients undergoing hybrid IS-FPB.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 75 patients (76 limbs) treated with concurrent IS-FPB from 2010 to 2016.
- Kaplan-Meier analysis for long-term patency and limb salvage rates.
- Univariate and multivariate analyses to assess predictors of patency.
Main Results:
- Technical success rate was 99% with low early complications (6%).
- At 42 months, primary patency was 65.2%, with femoro-popliteal bypass occlusion being the main issue (69.5% patency).
- Use of covered stents (CS) for iliac obstruction was an independent predictor of improved patency (HR 0.15, P=0.01).
Conclusions:
- Concurrent IS-FPB offers acceptable early and long-term results for multilevel disease.
- The use of CS for iliac artery stenting appears to enhance outcomes in these hybrid procedures.
Background:
In cases of multilevel obstructive atherosclerotic disease, hybrid procedures of concomitant iliac artery stenting and femoro-popliteal bypass (IS-FPB) may represent a valid approach, but results are still unclear. The aim was to evaluate early and long-term outcomes of concurrent IS-FPB.
Methods:
This retrospective study included 75 patients (76 limbs) treated with concomitant IS-FPB between January 2010 and June 2016. All patients were prospectively enrolled in a dedicated database. Long-term patency and limb salvage rates were reported using Kaplan-Meier curves. Clinical presentation, lesion sites and extension, distal runoff, type of stent, and bypass were evaluated for their association with patency using univariate and multivariate analysis.
Results:
Mean age was 72.2 ± 9.4 years; the Society for Vascular Surgery comorbidity score was 1.14 ± 0.61. A covered stent (CS) was implanted in 41 (54%) iliac arteries and a bare-metal stent in 35 (46%); a polytetrafluoroethylene graft was used for bypass in 44 limbs (58%) while 32 limbs (42%) had great saphenous vein bypass. Technical success was 99%; the 30-day cumulative surgical complications rate was 6%, mortality 2%, and morbidity 1%. At 42 months, primary patency of the entire ilio-femoral axis was 65.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 53-86%). This finding was primarily related to femoro-popliteal bypass occlusion (primary patency, 69.5%), rather than iliac stent loss of patency (primary patency, 94.6%). Secondary patency was 77.6% and limb salvage 89.9%. Univariate analysis demonstrated that Rutherford category 5/6 was a negative predictor of FPB patency (P = 0.04), whereas common femoral artery endarterectomy (P = 0.03) and the use of a CS (P = 0.02) were positive predictors. Multivariate analysis finally indicated that the use of CS to treat iliac obstructive disease was an independent predictor of patency (hazard ratio, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.03-0.64; P = 0.01).
Conclusions:
Concurrent IS-FPB has acceptable early and long-term results. Even if further studies are needed, the use of a CS for the iliac obstruction seem to provide better outcomes in the hybrid treatment of these cases of multilevel disease.
Related Concept Videos
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care

