Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 2, 2026

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
Understanding investigators' attitudes through a results-based accountability framework within a single CTSA
Erin Rothwell1, Trent Matheson1
1College of Nursing, and School of Medicine in the Division of Medical Ethics and Humanities, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Purpose:
The National Center for Advancing Translation Science (NCATS) is implementing a new strategic management plan called the results-based accountability framework. This framework is part of the common metrics initiative. For successful implementation and adoption of new management strategies, it is important to assess current stakeholders' experiences and needs.
Methods:
Interviews were conducted with principal investigators who are conducting research and supported by the Center for Clinical Translational Science at the University of Utah. Between July and August 2016, 15 interviews were completed and audio recorded. A qualitative content analysis was conducted on the transcripts.
Results:
Results indicated the need to provide education about the continuum of clinical translational research; time constraints during pre-award; barriers to IRB submissions; difficulty balancing other responsibilities in academic health centers; and the need for shared study coordinator resources.
Conclusion:
Implementing a new management philosophy requires an understanding key stakeholders attitudes and needs. The research identified ways to help engage investigators with centralized resources supported by NCATS and implementation of common metrics at this university.
Related Concept Videos
Accountability and Responsibility of a Nurse II
For example, a nurse demonstrating respect and compassion might listen attentively to a patient's concerns, provide...
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
SBAR I: Understanding the Concept
Standardized methods of communication have been developed to ensure that information is...
Accountability and Responsibility of a Nurse I
Quality Assurance

