Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 2, 2026

Identification and Protection of the Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve during Transoral Robotic Thyroidectomy
Published on: October 24, 2025
What should we expect from robotic surgery for second primary oropharyngeal cancer?
Tuan-Jen Fang1,2,3,4, Li-Ang Lee5,6,7, Bing-Shan Huang6,7,8
1Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taiwan. fang3109@cgmh.org.tw.
Abstract:
The outcomes of second primary oropharyngeal cancer (SPOPC) may not be determined by oropharyngeal cancer but from the other index cancer as well. The management of (SPOPC) remains inconclusive and limited. Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) to maximize the functional outcomes without reducing oncologic effect is suggested as the primary treatment for selected oropharyngeal cancer. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and outcomes of TORS for the management of SPOPC. Patients who underwent TORS from January 2011 to June 2015 at a tertian referral center in Taiwan were recruited. Loco-regional status, overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and postoperative functional status were evaluated. Fifteen patients received TORS for SPOPC with curative intent, including eleven with tongue-base carcinomas, and four with tonsil carcinomas. One case was terminated because of inadequate exposure and the other 14 cases were completed with negative pathologic margins. Two-year OS and DSS were 53 and 77%, respectively. Patients with SPOPC occurring within 6 months had poorer outcomes (p = 0.044). The median time to feeding-tube removal was 5 days, and one patient had long-term gastric-tube dependence. Patients of age <65 years with synchronous SPOPC and esophageal cancer as the other index cancer were significant worse in oncologic outcomes. We concluded that TORS is a feasible alternative treatment in selected patients with SPOPC. Patients with metachronous T1-2 SPOPC without an esophageal primary can achieve excellent survival after TORS, while TORS can maximize functional preservation with limited destruction in patients with low life expectancy.
Insights
Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) is a feasible treatment for selected second primary oropharyngeal cancer (SPOPC) patients. This approach maximizes functional outcomes while preserving oncologic control, offering a viable alternative for managing this complex condition.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Surgical Oncology
- Otolaryngology
Background:
- Outcomes for second primary oropharyngeal cancer (SPOPC) are influenced by other cancers.
- Management strategies for SPOPC are limited and inconclusive.
- Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) is proposed for selected SPOPC cases to balance oncologic and functional results.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the feasibility and outcomes of TORS in managing SPOPC.
- To evaluate loco-regional control, survival rates, and postoperative function in SPOPC patients treated with TORS.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 15 patients who underwent TORS for SPOPC with curative intent.
- Data collected from January 2011 to June 2015 at a tertiary referral center in Taiwan.
- Evaluation of loco-regional status, overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and functional outcomes.
Main Results:
- TORS was completed in 14 of 15 patients with negative pathologic margins.
- Two-year OS and DSS rates were 53% and 77%, respectively.
- SPOPC within 6 months and synchronous esophageal cancer in patients <65 years were associated with poorer outcomes.
Conclusions:
- TORS is a feasible treatment option for selected SPOPC patients.
- Metachronous T1-2 SPOPC without esophageal primary shows excellent survival post-TORS.
- TORS offers functional preservation with minimal destruction, especially for patients with limited life expectancy.
More Related Videos
03:07Single-Port Robotic-assisted Transaxillary Breast-conserving Surgery: A Prospective, Single-arm, Non-randomized Phase IIa Clinical Trial
Published on: August 19, 2025
07:22Surgical Robot-Assisted Transanal Specimen Extraction Radical Sigmoidectomy Without an Auxiliary Abdominal Incision
Published on: June 13, 2025