Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Framing Effects03:26

Framing Effects

8.0K
Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in...
8.0K
First Impression01:09

First Impression

283
First impressions play a crucial role in social perception, shaping how individuals assess others in professional, academic, and interpersonal contexts. Psychological research highlights the significance of cognitive biases, such as the primacy and recency effects, which influence how people interpret and recall information.The Primacy Effect and Cognitive AnchoringThe primacy effect describes the tendency for initial information to impact judgment disproportionately. When individuals encounter...
283
Serial Position Effect01:03

Serial Position Effect

596
The serial position effect is a cognitive phenomenon where individuals are more likely to recall the first and last items in a list compared to those in the middle. This effect is divided into the primacy effect and the recency effect. The primacy effect is observed when the initial items in a list are remembered better. This occurs because these items are rehearsed more frequently or receive more elaborative processing, allowing them to be encoded into long-term memory more effectively. For...
596
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

7.6K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
7.6K
Motivational Bias01:25

Motivational Bias

432
Cognitive bias results from limitations in thinking and information processing, leading to systematic errors in judgment. Conversely, motivational bias stems from personal desires or emotions, causing distortions in perception to align with self-interest. Motivational bias influences how individuals perceive and attribute causes to events, often shaped by personal needs, goals, and self-esteem preservation. This bias can distort judgment, leading to inaccurate assessments of success, failure,...
432
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

4.5K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now? 
4.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A Passage of Time Signal in the Human Brain.

eNeuro·2026
Same author

Spontaneous Oscillatory Activity in Episodic Timing: An EEG Replication Study and Its Limitations.

eNeuro·2026
Same author

Alpha power indexes working memory load for durations.

iScience·2026
Same author

Emotional Blunting and Time Estimation in Depression.

Biological psychiatry global open science·2025
Same author

Neural Representation of Episodic Time.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2025
Same author

Temporal Window of Integration XOR Temporal Window of Synchrony.

Multisensory research·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 2, 2026

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.4K

Time Order as Psychological Bias.

Laetitia Grabot1,2, Virginie van Wassenhove1,2

  • 11 Cognitive Neuroimaging Unit, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Université Paris-Saclay.

Psychological Science
|May 10, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Temporal-order perception is a subjective psychological bias. While attention can modulate this bias, it cannot fully eliminate stable individual differences in perceiving event timing.

Keywords:
attentioninterindividual variabilitymultisensoryopen datatemporal ordertime consciousness

More Related Videos

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

1.2K
Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance
13:20

Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance

Published on: December 5, 2025

1.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 2, 2026

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.4K
The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

1.2K
Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance
13:20

Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance

Published on: December 5, 2025

1.1K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Psychophysics

Background:

  • Accurate perception of event chronology is crucial for understanding causality.
  • Systematic interindividual errors in temporal-order perception have been observed previously.
  • Attention influences event perception, potentially normalizing timing differences.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the stability of temporal-order perception across sensory modalities.
  • To assess the extent to which attention, via the prior-entry effect, can compensate for individual differences in timing perception.
  • To determine if temporal-order perception is inherently subjective and individually variable.

Main Methods:

  • A longitudinal study design was employed.
  • Participants' temporal-order perception was measured across and within sensory modalities.
  • The magnitude of the prior-entry effect was quantified for each participant.

Main Results:

  • Stable interindividual variability in temporal-order perception persisted across all measurements.
  • The prior-entry effect, while present, was insufficient to fully normalize subjective timing differences.
  • Individual differences in conscious time order were systematic and identifiable.

Conclusions:

  • Temporal-order perception is a stable, subjective psychological bias.
  • Attention modulates but does not eliminate interindividual differences in timing perception.
  • Subjective time order is intrinsically variable and traceable on an individual basis.