Embryotoxicity estimation of commonly used compounds with embryonic stem cell test
Hui Liu1, Caiping Ren1, Weidong Liu1
1Cancer Research Institute, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Key Laboratory for Carcinogenesis of Chinese Ministry of Health, School of Basic Medical Science, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410078, P.R. China.
Molecular Medicine Reports
|May 11, 2017
Summary
The embryonic stem cell test (EST) offers a reliable in vitro alternative to animal testing for embryotoxicity. This validated model successfully classified the embryotoxic potential of four compounds, demonstrating its utility in chemical safety assessment.
Area of Science:
- Toxicology
- Developmental Biology
- In Vitro Assays
Background:
- The embryonic stem cell test (EST) is a validated in vitro alternative to animal testing for assessing chemical embryotoxicity.
- It utilizes murine fibroblasts (BALB/c-3T3) and embryonic stem cells (mES-D3) instead of live animals.
- The EST evaluates inhibition of cell growth (IC50) and differentiation (ID50) to predict embryotoxic potential.
Purpose of the Study:
- To establish and verify an in vitro embryonic stem cell test (EST) model for embryotoxicity assessment.
- To evaluate the embryotoxic potential of four distinct chemical compounds using the established EST model.
- To confirm the reliability of the EST system by comparing its predictions with known toxicological data.
Main Methods:
- Established an EST model using BALB/c-3T3 and mES-D3 cell lines, adhering to EU Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods standards.
- Validated the model using 5-fluorouracil (positive control, strong embryotoxicity) and penicillin G (negative control, non-embryotoxic).
- Assessed the embryotoxicity of eugenol, carnosic acid, procyanidin, and dioctyl phthalate using cytotoxicity and differentiation assays.
Main Results:
- The EST model successfully classified the embryotoxic potentials of the tested compounds.
- Eugenol was identified as having strong embryotoxicity.
- Carnosic acid and dioctyl phthalate showed weak embryotoxicity, while procyanidin exhibited non-embryotoxicity.
Conclusions:
- The established EST model is a reliable and effective in vitro system for predicting chemical embryotoxicity.
- The EST system accurately classified the varying degrees of embryotoxicity for eugenol, carnosic acid, procyanidin, and dioctyl phthalate.
- This validated alternative to animal testing contributes to safer chemical assessment and development.
Related Concept Videos
Embryonic Stem Cells
33.0K
Embryonic stem (ES) cells are undifferentiated pluripotent cells, meaning they can produce any cell type in the body. This gives them tremendous potential in science and medicine since they can generate specific cell types for use in research or to replace body cells lost due to damage or disease.
33.0K
Embryonic Stem Cells
5.6K
Embryonic stem (ES) cells were first discovered in mice in 1981 by Martin Evans. In 1998, James Thomson identified a method to isolate embryonic stem cells from humans. Human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) are obtained from 3-5 day old embryos that remain unused after an in vitro fertilization procedure.
ES cells are grown in a culture medium where they can divide indefinitely, creating ES cell lines. Under certain conditions, ES cells can differentiate, either spontaneously into a variety of...
ES cells are grown in a culture medium where they can divide indefinitely, creating ES cell lines. Under certain conditions, ES cells can differentiate, either spontaneously into a variety of...
5.6K
Toxicity Testing in Animals
68
Toxicity tests in animals are grounded on two main assumptions: first, the effects observed in laboratory animals can be extrapolated to humans, especially when adjusted for body surface area; second, high-dose exposure in animals is essential to identify potential human hazards from lower doses. This is based on the quantal dose-response concept, which faces the challenge of extrapolating results from relatively few test animals to much larger human populations. For example, a 0.01% incidence...
68


