Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 2, 2026

Multimedia Battery for Assessment of Cognitive and Basic Skills in Mathematics BM-PROMA
Published on: August 28, 2021
The Minimal Clinically Important Difference for the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory
James F Malec1, Jacob Kean, Patrick O Monahan
1Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Indiana University School of Medicine, Rehabilitation Hospital of Indiana, Indianapolis (Dr Malec); Salt Lake City VA Health Care System, Health System Innovation and Research, Departments of Population Health Sciences and Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Utah, Salt Lake City (Dr Kean); and Department of Biostatistics and Department of Public Health, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis (Dr Monahan).
The Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) for the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory-4 (MPAI-4) is 5 T-score points, and the Robust Clinically Important Difference (RCID) is 9 T-score points. These values indicate meaningful change in intervention response.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Rehabilitation Medicine
- Psychometrics
Background:
- The Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory-4 (MPAI-4) is used to assess outcomes in individuals with acquired brain injury.
- Establishing clear benchmarks for meaningful change is crucial for interpreting intervention effectiveness.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) and Robust Clinically Important Difference (RCID) for the MPAI-4.
- To establish reliable measures of response to intervention in neurorehabilitation.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 3,087 individuals with acquired brain injury from the OutcomeInfo Database.
- Utilized both distribution- and anchor-based methods to determine MCID and RCID.
- Evaluated findings against clinical provider ratings.
Main Results:
- The MCID for the MPAI-4 was determined to be 5 T-score points (5T).
- The RCID for the MPAI-4 was determined to be 9 T-score points (9T).
- Clinical raters considered 5T and 9T changes as meaningful improvements (81-87% and 99%, respectively).
Conclusions:
- 5T represents the MCID and 9T represents the RCID for the MPAI-4.
- These values are lower than the Reliable Change Index (RCI), suggesting RCI may be statistically significant but not always clinically meaningful.
- The MCID and RCID provide valuable metrics for assessing meaningful change in intervention response for individuals with acquired brain injury.
More Related Videos
06:23The 4 Mountains Test: A Short Test of Spatial Memory with High Sensitivity for the Diagnosis of Pre-dementia Alzheimer's Disease
Published on: October 13, 2016
10:26Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
Published on: September 11, 2021