Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 2, 2026

In Vitro Thrombosis Test for Ventricular Assist Devices
Published on: March 21, 2025
Anticoagulation Control in Patients With Ventricular Assist Devices
Amelia K Boehme1, Salpy V Pamboukian, James F George
1From the *Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama; †Department of Neurology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama; ‡Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama; §Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama; ¶Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama; ‖Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama; and #Heart South Cardiovascular Group, Columbiana, Alabama.
Achieving optimal anticoagulation control in left ventricular assist device (LVAD) patients significantly reduces the risk of thromboembolism and hemorrhage. Maintaining international normalized ratio (INR) within the target range is crucial for patient outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Hematology
- Medical Device Technology
Background:
- Anticoagulation management is critical for patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs).
- Suboptimal anticoagulation control is linked to increased risks of thromboembolism and hemorrhage.
- Previous studies have not extensively evaluated the impact of specific anticoagulation control metrics on these adverse events in LVAD patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the relationship between the percentage of time spent in the target international normalized ratio (INR) range (PTTR) and the risk of thromboembolism and hemorrhage in LVAD patients.
- To assess the adequacy of anticoagulation control in continuous flow LVAD recipients.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 115 patients (≥19 years) with continuous flow LVADs implanted between 2006 and 2012.
- Estimation of PTTR for INR target range of 2.0-3.0, categorized as PTTR > 60%, PTTR ≥ 50% to < 60%, and PTTR < 50%.
- Statistical assessment of the association between PTTR categories and the incidence of thromboembolism and hemorrhage, adjusting for covariates.
Main Results:
- Only 20% of LVAD patients achieved the target anticoagulation control (PTTR > 60%).
- Patients with PTTR ≥ 60% had a significantly lower relative risk of thromboembolism (HR: 0.37) and hemorrhage (HR: 0.45) compared to those with PTTR < 50%.
- No significant reduction in risk was observed for patients with PTTR between 50% and 60%.
Conclusions:
- LVAD patients, on average, spend only 42.9% of the time within the recommended INR target range.
- Achieving a PTTR greater than 60% is associated with significantly reduced risks of both thromboembolism and hemorrhage in LVAD recipients.
- This study highlights the importance of optimizing anticoagulation control in LVAD patients to improve clinical outcomes.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Anticoagulant Drugs: Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins
Anticoagulant Drugs: Vitamin K Antagonists and Direct Oral Anticoagulants
Warfarin, a prominent vitamin K antagonist family member, exerts its effect by inhibiting the enzyme VKORC1 (vitamin K epoxide reductase complex 1). By hindering this enzyme, warfarin...
Cardiac Catheterization IV: Nursing Management
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Venous Thrombosis IV: Nursing Management

