Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 2, 2026

Effective Analysis of Human Exposure Conditions with Body-worn Dosimeters in the 2.4 GHz Band
Published on: May 2, 2018
Design and application of an assessment protocol for electromagnetic tracking systems
Johann B Hummel1, Michael R Bax2, Michael L Figl3
1Center of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria, Image Guidance Laboratories, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California and Ludwig-Boltzmann Institute of Nuclear Medicine, Vienna, Austria.
This study introduces a new phantom and protocol for evaluating electromagnetic tracking systems like NDI Aurora and Ascension microBIRD. It quantifies positional and rotational errors, finding NDI Aurora better for orientation but Ascension microBIRD more sensitive to metallic interference.
Area of Science:
- Medical instrumentation
- Electromagnetic tracking systems
- Surgical navigation
Background:
- Accurate electromagnetic tracking is crucial for minimally invasive surgery and image-guided interventions.
- Existing evaluation methods lack standardization, hindering direct comparison between different tracking systems.
- The influence of environmental factors, particularly metallic objects, on tracking accuracy requires detailed investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and validate a novel phantom and protocol for the competitive and quantified evaluation of electromagnetic tracking systems.
- To assess the reproducibility and comparability of tracking system performance in a controlled environment.
- To investigate the impact of metallic interference on the accuracy of position and orientation measurements.
Main Methods:
- A custom-designed base plate with a precise grid of holes for position and rotation measurements was manufactured.
- Sensors were mounted on a fixture that fit into the base plate's grid holes for standardized placement.
- Relative positional and orientational errors were calculated by comparing measured values to known distances and rotations.
- The effect of metallic objects (steel, aluminum, bronze rods) on tracking accuracy was systematically evaluated.
Main Results:
- Positional jitter was measured at 0.14 mm for NDI Aurora (A) and 0.08 mm for Ascension microBIRD (B).
- Relative positional errors at 50 mm distance were 0.96±0.68 mm (A) and 1.14±0.78 mm (B).
- Relative rotation errors were 0.51° (A) and 0.04° (B), indicating NDI Aurora's lower orientation accuracy.
- Steel 416 caused the most significant distortion (up to 4.2 mm error), with Ascension microBIRD (B) being more sensitive to metallic objects.
- Ascension microBIRD (B) exhibited a systematic error in distance calculations.
Conclusions:
- The developed phantom and protocol provide a reliable method for evaluating and comparing electromagnetic tracking systems.
- NDI Aurora demonstrates superior orientation accuracy, while Ascension microBIRD shows higher sensitivity to metallic interference and systematic distance errors.
- The findings highlight the importance of considering environmental factors, especially metallic objects, when selecting and implementing electromagnetic tracking solutions.
More Related Videos
08:09Multifunctional Setup for Studying Human Motor Control Using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Electromyography, Motion Capture, and Virtual Reality
Published on: September 3, 2015
08:24Conventional and Threshold-Tracking Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Tests for Single-handed Operation
Published on: August 16, 2021