Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 2, 2026

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
Published on: September 19, 2012
The Effect of Wealth Shocks on Loss Aversion: Behavior and Neural Correlates
V S Chandrasekhar Pammi1, Sergio Ruiz2,3, Sangkyun Lee4
1Centre of Behavioural and Cognitive Sciences, University of AllahabadAllahabad, India.
Loss aversion, the tendency to feel losses more strongly than gains, is amplified when individuals believe their decisions cause negative financial outcomes. This effect was observed in behavioral and brain imaging studies.
Area of Science:
- Neuroeconomics
- Behavioral Economics
- Cognitive Neuroscience
Background:
- Kahneman and Tversky (1979) established loss aversion, where potential losses outweigh potential gains in decision-making.
- Understanding factors influencing loss aversion in financial decisions is crucial for economic behavior.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how sudden changes in wealth, particularly negative ones, affect loss aversion.
- To differentiate the neural correlates of loss aversion when individuals perceive agency over financial outcomes versus when outcomes are random.
Main Methods:
- Utilized functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in an experimental paradigm with two conditions: RANDOM (wealth changes independent of choices) and CONTINGENT (wealth changes perceived as consequences of choices).
- Behavioral data captured decision-making patterns related to gambles involving potential gains and losses.
- fMRI data analyzed neural activity associated with different conditions and wealth shock types.
Main Results:
- Behavioral data revealed significantly greater loss aversion in the CONTINGENT condition compared to RANDOM following negative wealth shocks.
- No significant differences in loss aversion were found between conditions for positive wealth shocks.
- fMRI identified a common neural network for loss aversion (striatum, amygdala, dACC) across both conditions.
- However, the ventral prefrontal cortex (vPFC), somatosensory cortex, and superior occipital cortex showed heightened activation in the CONTINGENT condition during negative wealth shocks, indicating agency's influence.
Conclusions:
- Striatal activation correlates with loss aversion irrespective of the shock's origin (agency vs. randomness).
- The ventral prefrontal cortex (vPFC) specifically encodes the perceived agency in decision-making, modulating loss aversion.
- These findings deepen our understanding of the psychological and neural mechanisms underlying financial decision-making under risk and perceived control.
More Related Videos
08:24The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
13:08Measurement of Fronto-limbic Activity Using an Emotional Oddball Task in Children with Familial High Risk for Schizophrenia
Published on: December 2, 2015
Related Concept Videos
The Influence of Cognition on Affect
Causes of Social Behavior II: Cognitive Processes