S-1 versus placebo in patients with sorafenib-refractory advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (S-CUBE): a randomised,

Masatoshi Kudo1, Michihisa Moriguchi2, Kazushi Numata3

  • 1Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.

Abstract

Insights

This study found that S-1 did not improve overall survival in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma refractory to sorafenib. Further research is needed to identify potential patient subgroups who may benefit from S-1 treatment.

Area of Science:

  • Hepatobiliary Cancers
  • Oncology
  • Pharmacology

Background:

  • Advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a complex disease with limited treatment options for patients refractory to sorafenib.
  • Sorafenib is the first-line targeted therapy for unresectable advanced HCC.
  • Identifying effective treatments for sorafenib-refractory HCC is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the efficacy and safety of S-1, a fluorouracil-based chemotherapy, in patients with advanced HCC who are refractory to sorafenib.
  • To determine if S-1 offers a survival benefit over placebo in this patient population.

Main Methods:

  • A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study conducted across 57 sites in Japan.
  • 334 patients with sorafenib-refractory advanced HCC were randomized (2:1) to receive oral S-1 or placebo.
  • The primary endpoint was overall survival, with patients stratified by site and metastatic status.

Main Results:

  • Median overall survival was similar between the S-1 group (11.1 months) and the placebo group (11.2 months) (hazard ratio 0.86, p=0.220).
  • Common adverse events in the S-1 group included skin hyperpigmentation, decreased appetite, fatigue, diarrhea, and increased bilirubin.
  • Serious adverse events were more frequent in the S-1 group (41%) compared to placebo (22%).

Conclusions:

  • S-1 did not demonstrate a significant improvement in overall survival for patients with sorafenib-refractory advanced HCC.
  • Further investigation is warranted to identify specific patient subgroups who might respond favorably to S-1 therapy.

Related Concept Videos

Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Dose Adjustments Due to Hepatic Impairment01:08

Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Dose Adjustments Due to Hepatic Impairment

Hepatic impairment, characterized by decreased liver function, does not uniformly mandate adjustments in drug dosage. Whether dosage modifications are necessary depends on various factors related to the drug's metabolism and elimination pathways. If a drug is primarily excreted via the kidneys and bypasses significant hepatic processing, if it undergoes minimal metabolic transformation in the liver, or if it is volatile and primarily expelled through the lungs, dose adjustments may not be...
317
Clinical Trials: Overview01:11

Clinical Trials: Overview

Clinical development focuses on how the drug will interact with the human body and encompasses four key phases of clinical trials, each serving a specific purpose in assessing the safety and effectiveness of new drugs. These phases overlap and build upon one another. Phase I involves a small group of healthy volunteers (typically 20-80 individuals) or, in cases where significant toxicity is expected, patients with the targeted disease, such as cancer or AIDS. The volunteers are tested for...
5.2K
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients01:15

Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients

Bioavailability studies are essential for evaluating a drug's therapeutic efficacy and understanding its absorption patterns under various physiological conditions. Conducting such studies on target patient populations provides more relevant data by simulating real-world disease states. However, practical challenges often necessitate the use of young, healthy adult volunteers as study subjects.Patients may exhibit altered drug absorption patterns due to the effects of the disease itself,...
192
Blinding01:11

Blinding

Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.
4.0K
Bioavailability Study Design: Single Versus Multiple Dose Studies01:11

Bioavailability Study Design: Single Versus Multiple Dose Studies

Bioavailability studies are essential for understanding how a drug is absorbed, distributed, metabolized, and excreted in the body. These studies assess the extent and rate at which the active pharmaceutical agent becomes available at the site of action. The design of bioavailability studies can involve single-dose or multiple-dose regimens, each with distinct advantages and limitations.Single-dose studies are the preferred approach due to their simplicity and reduced drug exposure for...
290
Clinical Trials01:16

Clinical Trials

Clinical trials are prospective experimental studies conducted on humans to determine the safety and efficacy of treatments, drugs, diet methods, and medical devices. Using statistics in clinical trials enables researchers to derive reasonable and accurate conclusions from the collected data, allowing them to make wise decisions in uncertain situations. In medical research, statistical methods are crucial for preventing errors and bias.
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
11.0K