Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Contaminants and Errors01:16

Contaminants and Errors

437
Effective sample preparation is crucial for accurate and reliable laboratory analysis. During this process, two significant sources of error can arise: concentration bias from improper sample splitting and contamination caused by methods used to reduce particle size, such as grinding or homogenization. Identifying and minimizing these potential errors is crucial to ensuring the validity of the analysis.
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
437
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

11.2K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
11.2K
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

11.7K
Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
11.7K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

15.6K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
15.6K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

1.5K
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
1.5K
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving01:29

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving

375
Mechanistic models play a crucial role in algorithms for numerical problem-solving, particularly in nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NMEM). These models aim to minimize specific objective functions by evaluating various parameter estimates, leading to the development of systematic algorithms. In some cases, linearization techniques approximate the model using linear equations.
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
375

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Association Between Hyponatremia and Rehabilitation Outcomes After Stroke: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.

Journal of clinical medicine·2026
Same author

Ecological network collapse and functional potential shifts in the canine oral microbiota associated with periodontal disease: a pilot study.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Impact of ice pack quantity and external temperature on chicken meat freshness during distribution in insulated boxes.

Food science of animal resources·2026
Same author

Thermal stress responses and heat stress resilience genes in chickens are revealed through genomic and transcriptomic insights.

Journal of animal science and biotechnology·2026
Same author

Computational identification of natural inhibitors targeting GroEL in <i>Leptospira interrogans</i>: an integrative virtual screening and molecular dynamics approach.

Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology·2026
Same author

Investigating Marine Natural Products as Potential Antivirals of Mpox Virus Replication by Targeting Thymidylate Kinase.

ACS omega·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 2, 2026

Design and Analysis for Fall Detection System Simplification
08:05

Design and Analysis for Fall Detection System Simplification

Published on: April 6, 2020

11.2K

A Formal Approach to the Selection by Minimum Error and Pattern Method for Sensor Data Loss Reduction in Unstable

Changhwa Kim1, DongHyun Shin2

  • 1Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Gangneung-Wonju National University, 150, Namwonro, Heungeop-myeon, Wonju-si, Gangwon-do 26403, Korea. kch@gwnu.ac.kr.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
|May 13, 2017
PubMed
Summary

Underwater acoustic sensor networks (UWASNs) face frequent communication failures causing significant data loss. This study introduces a framework and the Selection by Minimum Error and Pattern (SMEP) method to reduce data loss and minimize errors in UWASNs.

Keywords:
SMEP methodaverage sensor value error ratesensor data loss reductionunderwater acoustic sensor networksunstable communicationswireless sensor networks

More Related Videos

Large Scale Energy Efficient Sensor Network Routing Using a Quantum Processor Unit
05:30

Large Scale Energy Efficient Sensor Network Routing Using a Quantum Processor Unit

Published on: September 8, 2023

1.2K
Microfluidic Platform with Multiplexed Electronic Detection for Spatial Tracking of Particles
11:54

Microfluidic Platform with Multiplexed Electronic Detection for Spatial Tracking of Particles

Published on: March 13, 2017

9.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 2, 2026

Design and Analysis for Fall Detection System Simplification
08:05

Design and Analysis for Fall Detection System Simplification

Published on: April 6, 2020

11.2K
Large Scale Energy Efficient Sensor Network Routing Using a Quantum Processor Unit
05:30

Large Scale Energy Efficient Sensor Network Routing Using a Quantum Processor Unit

Published on: September 8, 2023

1.2K
Microfluidic Platform with Multiplexed Electronic Detection for Spatial Tracking of Particles
11:54

Microfluidic Platform with Multiplexed Electronic Detection for Spatial Tracking of Particles

Published on: March 13, 2017

9.9K

Area of Science:

  • Computer Science
  • Electrical Engineering
  • Sensor Networks

Background:

  • Wireless sensor networks, including terrestrial and underwater acoustic sensor networks (UWASNs), often suffer from unsafe communication channels.
  • UWASNs are particularly prone to frequent and prolonged communication failures, leading to substantial data loss.
  • Such data loss can have severe consequences for critical applications, potentially impacting human life and property.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a novel framework designed to mitigate sensor data loss during communication failures in UWASNs.
  • To present a formalized approach to the Selection by Minimum Error and Pattern (SMEP) method, a key component for reducing data loss within the proposed framework.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a framework to address sensor data loss in UWASNs.
  • Formalization and implementation of the Selection by Minimum Error and Pattern (SMEP) method.
  • Experimental validation of the SMEP method using real-field sensor data sets and comparison with existing methods.

Main Results:

  • The proposed framework effectively reduces sensor data loss during communication failures.
  • Experimental results demonstrate that the formalized SMEP method significantly outperforms other methods.
  • The SMEP method achieves a lower average sensor data value error rate compared to alternative approaches.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed framework and SMEP method offer a robust solution for enhancing data integrity in UWASNs.
  • The SMEP method is validated as a superior technique for minimizing data loss-induced errors in sensor networks.
  • This research contributes to improving the reliability of underwater acoustic sensor networks and their critical applications.