Is there a role for ischaemic conditioning in cardiac surgery?
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 2, 2026

Pre-clinical Model of Cardiac Donation after Circulatory Death
Published on: August 2, 2019
Luciano Candilio1,2, Derek Hausenloy1,2,3,4,5,6
1The Hatter Cardiovascular Institute, Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, UK.
Insights
Remote ischaemic conditioning (RIC) aims to protect the heart during cardiac surgery but recent large trials show no benefit. Further research is needed to explore RIC
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Ischaemia-Reperfusion Injury
Background:
- Coronary artery disease (CAD) poses a significant global health burden.
- Higher-risk patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery face increased risk of perioperative myocardial injury (PMI).
- Novel strategies are needed to mitigate PMI and improve outcomes in cardiac surgery.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review ischaemic conditioning as an endogenous cardioprotective strategy.
- To discuss the potential of remote ischaemic conditioning (RIC) in cardiac surgery.
- To explore reasons for the limited success of limb RIC in recent clinical trials.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing literature on ischaemic conditioning and RIC.
- Analysis of findings from small clinical studies and large multicentre randomised trials.
- Discussion of the clinical application and outcomes of limb RIC in cardiac surgery.
Main Results:
- Ischaemic conditioning offers endogenous cardioprotection via brief cycles of ischaemia and reperfusion.
- Limb RIC, a non-invasive form of RIC, has shown promise in smaller studies.
- Three large multicentre trials found no significant benefit of limb RIC on short-term or long-term clinical outcomes in cardiac surgery patients.
Conclusions:
- Despite negative results in cardiac surgery, limb RIC may retain therapeutic potential for other conditions like acute myocardial infarction.
- RIC might offer protection to other organs, including the brain, kidney, and liver, against ischaemia/reperfusion injury.
- Further investigation is warranted to understand the discrepancies and optimize RIC's application in different clinical settings.
Abstract:
Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery is the revascularisation strategy of choice in patients with diabetes mellitus and complex CAD. Owing to a number of factors, including the ageing population, the increased complexity of CAD being treated, concomitant valve and aortic surgery, and multiple comorbidities, higher-risk patients are being operated on, the result of which is an increased risk of sustaining perioperative myocardial injury (PMI) and poorer clinical outcomes. As such, new treatment strategies are required to protect the heart against PMI and improve clinical outcomes following cardiac surgery. In this regard, the heart can be endogenously protected from PMI by subjecting the myocardium to one or more brief cycles of ischaemia and reperfusion, a strategy called "ischaemic conditioning". However, this requires an intervention applied directly to the heart, which may be challenging to apply in the clinical setting. In this regard, the strategy of remote ischaemic conditioning (RIC) may be more attractive, as it allows the endogenous cardioprotective strategy to be applied away from the heart to the arm or leg by simply inflating and deflating a cuff on the upper arm or thigh to induce one or more brief cycles of ischaemia and reperfusion (termed "limb RIC"). Although a number of small clinical studies have demonstrated less PMI with limb RIC following cardiac surgery, three recently published large multicentre randomised clinical trials found no beneficial effects on short-term or long-term clinical outcomes, questioning the role of limb RIC in the setting of cardiac surgery. In this article, we review ischaemic conditioning as a therapeutic strategy for endogenous cardioprotection in patients undergoing cardiac surgery and discuss the potential reasons for the failure of limb RIC to improve clinical outcomes in this setting. Crucially, limb RIC still has the therapeutic potential to protect the heart in other clinical settings, such as acute myocardial infarction, and it may also protect other organs against acute ischaemia/reperfusion injury (such as the brain, kidney, and liver).
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Ischemic Heart Disease: Overview
Atherosclerosis, the primary malefactor, orchestrates this dangerous condition. It manifests as the accumulation of fatty deposits, akin to insidious plaques, within arterial walls. As time elapses, these plaques metamorphose, hardening and...

