Effect of intermittent feeding and oat hulls to improve phytase efficacy and digestive function in broiler chickens

1. Two trials were carried out to investigate the impact of intermittent feeding and oat hulls as methods to stimulate the anterior digestive tract in broiler chickens. 2. In Trial 1, 7-d-old broilers were placed 4 per cage in 48 cages and fed either ad libitum or intermittently on a diet with 50 g/kg of either oat hulls or cellulose, with or without 1000 FTU phytase, in a 2 × 2 × 2 factorial arrangement. Ad libitum fed birds had two 4-h dark periods with 1-h light in between, while intermittently fed birds in addition had restricted access to feed through four 1 h feeding bouts. 3. In Trial 2, 144 broiler chickens were divided amongst 12 pens which were intermittently fed on the same diets as in Trial 1 in a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement. At 34 d of age, after 16 h feed withdrawal, birds were fed for 1 h, followed by dissection of 4 birds per treatment every hour for 9 h. Contents from different segments of the digestive tract were collected quantitatively to assess dry matter (DM) and starch flow. 4. In Trial 1, phytase improved performance and nutrient availability, while oat hulls and intermittent feeding improved some measures of nutrient availability. Intermittent feeding augmented the effect of phytase on myo-inositol hexakisphosphate (IP6) degradation in the anterior digestive tract. 5. In Trial 2, birds filled up their crop and slowly passed these contents on to lower segments of the digestive tract. Already 1 h after commencement of feeding, the entire length of the small intestine was filled with DM, and no significant changes in DM content were observed before 4-5 h later, when the small intestine gradually became emptied. The tendency for a higher initial load of DM and starch in birds without oat hulls seems to support the hypothesis that one important function of the gizzard is feed-flow regulation. 6. In conclusion, the anterior digestive tract seems to have an important regulative function in broiler chickens when stimulated by intermittent feeding or structural components. More research is needed in order to elucidate the role of the crop and gizzard for phytase function.