Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 2, 2026
Author Spotlight: A Non-Invasive Tool to Assess and Differentiate Fat Patterns in Liver Using 3D Dixon MRI
Published on: October 20, 2023
Effect of a Low-Rank Denoising Algorithm on Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Measures of Liver Fat and
Brian C Allen1, Felix Lugauer, Dominik Nickel
1From the *Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; †Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg; ‡Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Erlangen, Germany; and §Siemens Medical Solutions, Inc, Morrisville, NC.
Purpose:
This study aimed to assess the effect of a low-rank denoising algorithm on quantitative magnetic resonance imaging-based measures of liver fat and iron.
Materials And Methods:
This was an institutional review board-approved, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant, retrospective analysis of 42 consecutive subjects who were imaged at 3T using a multiecho gradient echo sequence that was reconstructed using the multistep adaptive fitting algorithm to obtain quantitative proton density fat fraction (PDFF) and R2* maps (original maps). A patch-wise low-rank denoising algorithm was then applied, and PDFF and R2* maps were created (denoised maps). Three readers independently rated the PDFF maps in terms of vessel and liver edge sharpness and image noise using a 5-point scale. Two other readers independently measured mean and standard deviation of PDFF and R2* values for the original and denoised maps; values were compared using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and mean difference analyses.
Results:
Qualitatively, the denoised maps were preferred by all 3 readers based on image noise (P < 0.001) and by 2 of 3 readers based on vessel edge sharpness (P < 0.001-0.99). No reader had a significant preference regarding liver edge sharpness (P = 0.16-0.48). Quantitatively, agreement was near perfect between the original and denoised maps for PDFF (ICC = 0.995) and R2* (ICC = 0.995) values. Mean quantitative values obtained from the original and denoised maps were similar for liver PDFF (7.6 ± 7.7% vs 7.7 ± 7.8%; P = 0.63) and R2* (52.9 ± 40.3s vs 52.8 ± 41.1 s, P = 0.74).
Conclusions:
Applying the low-rank denoising algorithm to liver fat and iron quantification reduces image noise in PDFF and R2* maps without adversely affecting mean quantitative values or subjective image quality.
