Inferring personal economic status from social network location
Shaojun Luo1, Flaviano Morone1, Carlos Sarraute2
1Levich Institute and Department of Physics, City College of New York, New York, New York 10031, USA.
Nature Communications
|May 17, 2017
Summary
Social network position influences economic status. Analyzing telecommunications and financial data reveals network influence correlates with economic well-being, aiding targeted interventions.
Area of Science:
- Socioeconomics
- Network Science
- Computational Social Science
Background:
- Social ties are widely believed to impact individual economic status.
- Quantifying this relationship at a network level requires operational definitions and large-scale data analysis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a network-level measure of social influence to infer economic well-being.
- To analyze the correlation between social network position and economic status using real-world data.
- To validate the utility of social network metrics for targeted interventions.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of large-scale telecommunications and financial datasets from a national population.
- Development of a metric for individual location and influence within the social network structure.
- Implementation of a marketing campaign to compare targeted vs. random strategies.
Main Results:
- Individual network location, defined by collective influence, strongly correlates with personal economic status.
- Patterns of social influence within the network mirror economic inequality distributions.
- Targeting individuals based on social network metrics in a marketing campaign yielded a threefold increase in response rate compared to random targeting.
Conclusions:
- Social network structure provides a powerful tool for understanding and potentially influencing economic status.
- Network-based metrics can effectively identify individuals for targeted strategies, outperforming random approaches.
- This methodology has implications for economic policy, marketing, and understanding societal economic dynamics.
Related Concept Videos
Social Exchange Theory
582
As formulated by John Thibaut and Harold Kelley, Social Exchange Theory explains human relationships as economic-like exchanges that maximize rewards and minimize costs. This theory suggests that individuals engage in relationships to gain benefits and reduce burdens, similar to economic transactions. It has been widely applied to various types of relationships, including romantic, professional, and social interactions.Rewards and Costs in RelationshipsRelationship rewards include emotional...
582
Social Exchange Theory
40.8K
We have discussed why we form relationships, what attracts us to others, and different types of love. But what determines whether we are satisfied with and stay in a relationship? One theory that provides an explanation is social exchange theory. According to social exchange theory, we act as naïve economists in keeping a tally of the ratio of costs and benefits of forming and maintaining a relationship with others (Rusbult & Van Lange, 2003).
40.8K
Outliers and Influential Points
6.5K
An outlier is an observation of data that does not fit the rest of the data. It is sometimes called an extreme value. When you graph an outlier, it will appear not to fit the pattern of the graph. Some outliers are due to mistakes (for example, writing down 50 instead of 500), while others may indicate that something unusual is happening. Outliers are present far from the least squares line in the vertical direction. They have large "errors," where the "error" or residual is the...
6.5K
Sources of Self-Esteem III: Social Comparison
301
Social comparison plays a fundamental role in the evaluation of personal success and self-worth. Rather than assessing our achievements in isolation, we interpret their significance relative to personal goals and critically in comparison to the performance of others. A grade of B in a mathematics exam might elicit pride if one's expectation was a C, yet result in disappointment if an A was anticipated or if peers achieved superior results. These comparative evaluations illustrate how both...
301
The Representativeness Heuristic
17.0K
The representative heuristic describes a biased way of thinking, in which you unintentionally stereotype someone or something. For example, you may assume that your professors spend their free time reading books and engaging in intellectual conversation, because the idea of them spending their time playing volleyball or visiting an amusement park does not fit in with your stereotypes of professors.
17.0K
Causes of Social Behavior I: Actions and Characteristics of Individuals
393
The actions and characteristics of others heavily influence the causes of social behaviors. Emotional expressions serve as powerful social signals, shaping behaviors and interactions in significant ways. Whether through direct observation or subconscious processing, individuals constantly adjust their responses based on the emotions and attributes of those around them.Emotional Cues and Social ResponsesFacial expressions, tone of voice, and body language provide crucial emotional cues that...
393


