Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Pharmacodynamic Models: Additive and Proportional Drug Effect Model01:09

Pharmacodynamic Models: Additive and Proportional Drug Effect Model

44
Drug response models describe how pharmacological agents interact with biological systems to produce measurable effects. Baseline responses are inherent physiological activities without a drug significantly influencing the observed pharmacological outcomes. Depending on the drug response model employed, these baseline responses may combine with the drug's effect in either an additive or proportional manner.Additive Drug Response ModelIn the additive model, the drug effect is independent of the...
44
Parameters Affecting Nonlinear Elimination: Zero-Order Input, First-Order Absorption and Two-Compartment Model01:13

Parameters Affecting Nonlinear Elimination: Zero-Order Input, First-Order Absorption and Two-Compartment Model

377
Drugs administered through various routes can lead to nonlinear elimination, resulting in complex pharmacokinetic behaviors crucial to understanding efficacious drug dosing.
When a drug is administered through a constant intravenous infusion and eliminated via nonlinear pharmacokinetics, it follows zero-order input. For example, oral drugs undergo first-order absorption upon administration and are eliminated through nonlinear pharmacokinetics.
In the case of subcutaneously administered drugs,...
377
One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation01:24

One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation

1.3K
This lesson introduces two critical methods in pharmacokinetics, the Wagner-Nelson and Loo-Riegelman methods, used for estimating the absorption rate constant (ka) for drugs administered via non-intravenous routes. The Wagner-Nelson method relates ka to the plasma concentration derived from the slope of a semilog percent unabsorbed time plot. However, it is limited to drugs with one-compartment kinetics and can be impacted by factors like gastrointestinal motility or enzymatic degradation.
On...
1.3K
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis01:23

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

310
Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least...
310
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving01:29

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving

375
Mechanistic models play a crucial role in algorithms for numerical problem-solving, particularly in nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NMEM). These models aim to minimize specific objective functions by evaluating various parameter estimates, leading to the development of systematic algorithms. In some cases, linearization techniques approximate the model using linear equations.
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
375
Clearance Models: Noncompartmental Models01:17

Clearance Models: Noncompartmental Models

325
Clearance is a pharmacokinetic parameter traditionally defined by compartment models, signifying the rate at which a drug is expelled from the body. However, a noncompartmental model offers an alternative method for assessing clearance, primarily employing empirical data obtained after administering a single drug dose.
The noncompartmental approach capitalizes on extensive sampling data, correlating the volume of distribution to systemic exposure and the administered dosage. This method enables...
325

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Composition and spatio-temporal dynamics of aquatic bird community in humid areas of Alto Parana Atlantic Forest.

Brazilian journal of biology = Revista brasleira de biologia·2021
Same author

Selection of maize inbred lines and gene expression for resistance to ear rot.

Genetics and molecular research : GMR·2017
Same author

Maize hybrid stability in environments under water restriction using mixed models and factor analysis.

Genetics and molecular research : GMR·2017
Same author

Genetic progress estimation strategy for upright common bean plants using recurrent selection.

Genetics and molecular research : GMR·2017
Same author

White mold resistance-associated quantitative trait loci in the Jalo x Small White common bean population.

Genetics and molecular research : GMR·2016
Same author

Bayesian GGE biplot models applied to maize multi-environments trials.

Genetics and molecular research : GMR·2016

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 2, 2026

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.8K

Assessing non-additive effects in GBLUP model.

I C Vieira1, J P R Dos Santos2, L P M Pires3

  • 1Departamento de Biologia, Universidade Federal de Lavras, Lavras, MG, Brasil.

Genetics and Molecular Research : GMR
|May 17, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Including non-additive genetic effects in genomic prediction models can improve accuracy. However, accurate recovery of these effects and gains in prediction can be challenging due to model complexities and violated assumptions.

More Related Videos

Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills
06:52

Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills

Published on: September 17, 2019

6.8K
Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment
06:48

Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: June 25, 2019

9.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 2, 2026

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.8K
Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills
06:52

Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills

Published on: September 17, 2019

6.8K
Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment
06:48

Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: June 25, 2019

9.9K

Area of Science:

  • Quantitative genetics
  • Genomic selection
  • Plant breeding

Background:

  • Non-additive genetic effects are crucial for genotype selection in clonal or hybrid species.
  • Molecular markers facilitate the genomic-level study of non-additive effects on quantitative traits.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (GBLUP) model's behavior across different genetic models and relationship matrices.
  • To assess the influence of these variations on genetic parameter estimations.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized real Eucalyptus spp. data (circumference at breast height) and simulated F2 population data.
  • Employed three common kinship structures, including epistatic kinship.
  • Analyzed variance estimates using the Fisher information matrix.

Main Results:

  • Epistatic kinship inclusion improved genomic breeding value predictions in simulations, but non-additive effects were not accurately recovered.
  • Real data showed high collinearity in additive, dominant, and epistatic variance estimates, leading to convergence issues and no predictive gain.
  • Different kinship structures yielded varying genetic parameter and correlation estimates.

Conclusions:

  • Incorporating non-additive effects can enhance predictive ability, but distortions in variance estimates (e.g., under selection or inbreeding violating Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium) can negate gains.
  • Model convergence and accurate estimation of non-additive effects remain challenges in genomic kinship analysis.