Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 2, 2026

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
Published on: June 6, 2020
Survived so what? Identifying priorities for research with children and families post-paediatric intensive care unit
Joseph C Manning1,2,3, Pippa Hemingway4, Sarah A Redsell5
1Young People and Families Nursing, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Insights
Patient and public involvement is crucial for improving pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) aftercare. Children and adults identified holistic, family-centered services and research priorities, emphasizing communication and psycho-social outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
- Health Services Research
- Patient and Public Involvement
Background:
- Patient and public involvement enhances healthcare effectiveness and credibility.
- Limited research exists on the contributions of pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) survivors and their families to aftercare priorities.
- Over 96% of children and young people survive critical illness or injury, necessitating focus on their post-discharge needs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify service and research priorities for pediatric intensive care unit survivors.
- To involve children, young people, families, and other stakeholders in defining these priorities.
- To understand the perspectives of diverse stakeholder groups on post-PICU care.
Main Methods:
- A face-to-face, multiple-stakeholder consultation event was conducted in the Midlands, UK.
- Data collection involved write/draw and tell activities and focus groups.
- An inductive content analysis approach was used to analyze feedback from 26 participants.
Main Results:
- Consultation findings highlighted the need for holistic and family-centered future services, interventions, and research.
- Children and young people prioritized longer-term outcomes, while adult advisors focused on care pathways.
- Key priorities included addressing communication and information needs and optimizing psycho-social outcomes for survivors.
Conclusions:
- Meaningful patient and public involvement is valuable for identifying research and service priorities for PICU survivors.
- There are distinct priorities between pediatric and adult advisors regarding post-PICU care.
- Future research and services should be family-centered and address identified unmet needs.
Abstract:
The involvement of patients and the public in the development, implementation and evaluation of health care services and research is recognized to have tangible benefits in relation to effectiveness and credibility. However, despite >96% of children and young people surviving critical illness or injury, there is a paucity of published reports demonstrating their contribution to informing the priorities for aftercare services and outcomes research. We aimed to identify the service and research priorities for Paediatric Intensive Care Unit survivors with children and young people, their families and other stakeholders. We conducted a face-to-face, multiple-stakeholder consultation event, held in the Midlands (UK), to provide opportunities for experiences, views and priorities to be elicited. Data were gathered using write/draw and tell and focus group approaches. An inductive content analytical approach was used to categorize and conceptualize feedback. A total of 26 individuals attended the consultation exercise, including children and young people who were critical care survivors; their siblings; parents and carers; health professionals; academics; commissioners; and service managers. Consultation findings indicated that future services, interventions and research must be holistic and family-centred. Children and young people advisors reported priorities that focused on longer-term outcomes, whereas adult advisors identified priorities that mapped against the pathways of care. Specific priorities included developing and testing interventions that address unmet communication and information needs. Furthermore, initiatives to optimize the lives and longer-term functional and psycho-social outcomes of Paediatric Intensive Care Unit survivors were identified. This consultation exercise provides further evidence of the value of meaningful patient and public involvement in identifying the priorities for research and services for Paediatric Intensive Care Unit survivors and illuminates differences in proposed priorities between children, young people and adult advisors.
More Related Videos
14:43A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
11:50Clinical Practice Protocol of Creative Music Therapy for Preterm Infants and Their Parents in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit
Published on: January 7, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Planning Nursing Care I
Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions
Nursing Assessment
The nurse collects all aspects of the patient's health in the initial assessment, establishing priorities for ongoing focused assessments...
Acute Kidney Injury V: Interprofessional Care
Interdisciplinary Care: The Health Care Team-I
Physicians
The physician's primary responsibility is to diagnose illness and direct the medical or surgical treatment of the condition. The authority to admit patients to a healthcare agency or institution and practice care within that setting is granted to physicians by the healthcare agency or institution...
Patient-centered Care