Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 2, 2026

08:34
Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies
Published on: February 6, 2019
21.2K
Poster - Thur Eve - 61: A dosimetric comparison between single-arc and double-arc prostate VMAT plans.
Medical Physics
|May 19, 2017
Summary
The double-arc technique in volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for prostate cancer offers superior planning target volume coverage and rectal sparing compared to single-arc VMAT. Despite increased monitor units and treatment time, it is valuable for challenging cases.
Area of Science:
- Radiation Oncology
- Medical Physics
- Radiotherapy Planning
Background:
- Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) is a modern radiotherapy technique.
- Optimizing dose delivery for prostate cancer while sparing critical organs like the rectum is crucial.
- Single-arc and double-arc VMAT techniques present different dosimetric characteristics.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the dosimetry of single-arc versus double-arc VMAT for prostate cancer treatment.
- To evaluate the impact of arc technique on planning target volume (PTV) coverage and rectal dose.
- To analyze dose profiles and monitor unit requirements for both techniques.
Main Methods:
- VMAT plans (single-arc and double-arc) were created for five prostate cancer patients.
- Dosimetric analysis included dose-volume histograms and specific dose criteria (PTV D99%, rectum D30%, D50%).
- Dose profiles were analyzed, and monitor units (MUs) were calculated using Eclipse with RapidArc.
Main Results:
- Double-arc VMAT demonstrated improved PTV coverage and better rectal sparing across all patients.
- Dose profiles showed a lateral shift in the anterior-posterior direction with the double-arc technique.
- The double-arc technique required approximately 20% more MUs and nearly double the treatment time.
Conclusions:
- The double-arc VMAT technique is superior to single-arc for prostate cancer dosimetry, providing enhanced target coverage and organ-at-risk sparing.
- The increased MUs and treatment time are justified by the dosimetric benefits, especially in complex cases.
- Double-arc VMAT should be considered for prostate cancer patients when single-arc techniques fall short of dose criteria.

