Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 2, 2026

Construction of a Preclinical Multimodality Phantom Using Tissue-mimicking Materials for Quality Assurance in Tumor Size Measurement
Published on: July 29, 2013
SU-E-T-97: Intra and Inter Variability in Beam Data Commissioning among Water Phantom Scanning Systems
Modern water-phantom scanning systems show minimal intra- and inter-variability in commissioning data, typically within ±0.2% accuracy. This indicates high reliability for beam data collection across different vendors and equipment.
Area of Science:
- Medical Physics
- Radiation Oncology
- Radiotherapy Physics
Background:
- Accurate commissioning data is crucial for radiotherapy treatment planning.
- Various water-phantom scanning systems exist, but their data variability is not well-documented.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the intra- and inter-variability of commissioning data collected by modern water-phantom scanning systems.
- To evaluate the reliability and consistency of data from different vendors.
Main Methods:
- Four vendors' water-phantom scanning systems (PTW, Sun Nuclear, Standard Imaging, IBA) were used.
- Percent depth dose (PDD) and profile data were collected for photon and electron beams.
- Intra-variability was assessed through repeated measurements; inter-variability was assessed using single setups from each vendor.
Main Results:
- Intra-variability was consistently low (±0.1%) across all vendors.
- Inter-variability for PDDs was slightly higher but within acceptable ranges (e.g., 0.02±0.17% for SI vs PTW).
- Profile inter-variability was <0.1% in central regions but up to ±4.8% in penumbra; polarity effects up to 3% were observed.
Conclusions:
- Modern water-phantom scanning systems demonstrate minimal variability, achieving data accuracy within ±0.2% when used correctly.
- System selection should prioritize user comfort with software and hardware.
- This study offers a valuable comparison of data across different scanning systems.
More Related Videos
07:59Fat-Water Phantoms for Magnetic Resonance Imaging Validation: A Flexible and Scalable Protocol
Published on: September 7, 2018
06:20Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition
Published on: March 11, 2021