Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Are we safe? Exploring psychological factors affecting radiation risk perception of dwellers in old uranium mining quarters.

Annals of the ICRP·2026
Same author

Relationship between hair cortisol and plasma heat shock proteins in response to heat stress in tolerant and sensitive cattle breeds.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Addressing Critical Fungal Pathogens Under a One Health Perspective: Key Insights from the Portuguese Association of Medical Mycology.

Mycopathologia·2025
Same author

High dietary total energy intake and energy density are associated with girls' breast density during puberty.

European journal of nutrition·2025
Same author

Serum and saliva immunoglobulin (immunoglobulin G, immunoglobulin A, and immunoglobulin M) dynamics in newborn calves and their association with health status during the first week of life: An exploratory study.

Journal of dairy science·2025
Same author

Central nervous system vascular complications associated with the acute form of steroid-responsive meningitis-arteritis.

Veterinary journal (London, England : 1997)·2025
Same journal

Decomposition-based harmonization for quantitative PET imaging across scanners and radiotracers.

Medical physics·2026
Same journal

Development and evaluation of an in vivo dose-based monitoring system for electron FLASH radiation therapy.

Medical physics·2026
Same journal

A novel optical respiratory gating system with a hybrid phase-amplitude algorithm for spot-scanning proton therapy.

Medical physics·2026
Same journal

Gamma Knife treatment planning using knowledge-based reinforcement learning.

Medical physics·2026
Same journal

Development and characterization of a novel, small animal external beam irradiator using a clinical high dose rate brachytherapy source.

Medical physics·2026
Same journal

Deep learning-based dose prediction for MR-guided prostate SIB: Supporting rapid feasibility assessment and adaptive editing margin selection.

Medical physics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 2, 2026

Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition
06:20

Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition

Published on: March 11, 2021

7.8K

SU-E-T-390: Monitorization of the Dynamic Multi-Leaf Collimator Performance Using Log Files - a Quality Assurance

A Martins da Silva1, A Pereira1, M Barreiros1

  • 1Hospital do Espírito Santo de évora, Portugal.

Medical Physics
|May 19, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study establishes baseline values and tolerance levels for multi-leaf collimator (MLC) performance in intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). The new method provides quantitative, easy monitoring of MLC stability and performance for quality assurance.

Keywords:
CollimatorsIntensity modulated radiation therapyMultileaf collimatorsQuality assuranceStatistical analysis

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Improving Radiation Therapy Access with Radiation Planning Assistant
05:18

Author Spotlight: Improving Radiation Therapy Access with Radiation Planning Assistant

Published on: October 6, 2023

2.0K
Dynamic Lung Tumor Tracking for Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy
08:17

Dynamic Lung Tumor Tracking for Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy

Published on: June 7, 2015

16.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 2, 2026

Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition
06:20

Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition

Published on: March 11, 2021

7.8K
Author Spotlight: Improving Radiation Therapy Access with Radiation Planning Assistant
05:18

Author Spotlight: Improving Radiation Therapy Access with Radiation Planning Assistant

Published on: October 6, 2023

2.0K
Dynamic Lung Tumor Tracking for Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy
08:17

Dynamic Lung Tumor Tracking for Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy

Published on: June 7, 2015

16.3K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Physics
  • Radiation Oncology
  • Quality Assurance

Background:

  • Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) requires rigorous quality assurance for its complex delivery techniques.
  • Multi-leaf collimators (MLCs) are critical components in IMRT, necessitating precise performance monitoring.
  • Traditional MLC quality assurance methods can be time-consuming and difficult to interpret quantitatively.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To commission baseline values for the multi-leaf collimator (MLC) using Varian's dynalog file viewer software (DFV).
  • To establish tolerance levels for MLC performance as a periodic quality assurance tool in IMRT.
  • To develop a quantitative and user-friendly method for monitoring MLC stability.

Main Methods:

  • A sliding window test was conducted over 100 days with an MLC moving at 2.5 cm/s.
  • Data on leaf position deviations (bins 1-8) and root mean square error (RMS) were collected using DFV.
  • Statistical analysis was performed on data from various gantry angles (0°, 90°, 270°) to establish baseline values and tolerance limits.

Main Results:

  • The majority of leaf positions (97%) were within bin 4 (0.05mm to 0.25mm deviation).
  • Bins 7 and 8 (larger deviations) showed no counts, indicating high precision.
  • A tolerance level was set for bins 5-8, based on twice the standard deviation, with minor differences observed at different gantry angles.

Conclusions:

  • The developed method provides a quantitative and straightforward approach to monitor MLC performance in IMRT.
  • This technique enhances the thoroughness of MLC quality assurance, addressing limitations of previous methods.
  • The established baseline values and tolerance levels facilitate regular assessment of MLC stability and accuracy.